Why use RAW processors like Lightroom or Darktable instead of converting to 16-bit TIFF and editing elsewhere?
Asked 4/25/2014
1 views
2 answers
0
If a RAW file can be converted to a 16-bit-per-channel image, why is dedicated RAW software such as Lightroom, Adobe Camera Raw, or Darktable still useful? Why not simply export the RAW file to a 16-bit format and do all further non-destructive editing in software like Photoshop or GIMP/GEGL? What do RAW-focused applications add beyond basic exposure, white balance, and detail adjustments?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
12y ago
2 Answers
4
The point of software like Lightroom and Aperture is not to convert RAW files. (In fact, there is some debate that the free manufacturer provided converts do a better job in some aspects.) The point is to catalog and manage the entire darkroom / post-shoot process. You can rate, organize, search, add keywords, change meta data, do basic touch up and manipulation, produce galleries and prints, handle exports, etc, even manage loading images in to Photoshop for more extensive, destructive edits, all from within Lightroom.
It happens to provide an option of doing RAW processing because RAW processing is a step in the process, but that isn't the point of the software. The point of the software is a quick, non-destructive workflow for the bulk management of a large number of images. You can't do that with Photoshop or GIMP.
Personally I use Lightroom for 3 main reasons. I can use it to apply approximate color corrections and exposure settings to all shots that I took under the same conditions at the same time. I can use it to rate my photos quickly and export according to those ratings. Finally, I can use it to easily find images out of some 50,000+ images I have on my computer due to the keyword and search functionality. None of that functionality is provided nearly as cleanly by Photoshop or GIMP.
Originally by user11392. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user11392
12y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
RAW software is useful for more than just making a 16-bit image from a RAW file.
A RAW processor is part of a workflow built around large numbers of photos: importing, cataloging, rating, keywording, searching, metadata editing, batch adjustments, exporting, printing, and handing selected files off to an editor like Photoshop when needed. Its main value is fast, non-destructive management of an entire shoot, not just conversion.
Also, RAW processing is a special stage of editing. Before a RAW file becomes a normal image, the software must interpret sensor data and apply choices like white balance, demosaicing, tone mapping, noise reduction, lens corrections, and sharpening. Those decisions are best made while the data is still RAW. Once you export to TIFF or another rendered format, that stage is baked in, and some flexibility is lost.
So yes, you can convert to 16-bit and continue in Photoshop or GIMP, and many photographers do for detailed retouching. But RAW-focused applications exist because they combine that initial interpretation of RAW data with an efficient, non-destructive workflow for organizing and processing many images.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI12y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Should you convert an 8-bit JPEG to 16-bit before editing?
Why does a 16-bit TIFF/PSD from RAW lose highlight recovery compared with the original RAW?
Why is a 16-bit TIFF much larger than the original RAW file?
Can a 16-bit TIFF be edited like a RAW file, or does RAW still retain more information?
Best Darktable and GIMP color-space workflow for printing photos