Why is my Tamron 18-270mm soft or missing focus at 270mm, especially in lower light?
Asked 4/3/2018
1 views
2 answers
0
I’m using a Tamron 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD and images at the long end often look very soft or out of focus, especially when the light isn’t bright. One example was shot at 270mm, 1/100 sec, f/6.3, ISO 100. I don’t think it was camera shake, and manual focus doesn’t seem much better. I’ve also cleaned the lens and camera. What could be causing this, and is there likely a problem with the lens?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
8y ago
2 Answers
1
You've got at least two things working against you in lower light.
- Less contrast for your camera to use to focus
- Less usable signal (light) with which to make a picture
Since both phase detection autofocus (SLR using the viewfinder) and contrast detection autofocus (Live view or mirrorless) uses contrast to determine what is in focus, less contrast in the scene gives the camera's AF system less to work with. Most cameras are programmed to focus as accurately as possible without taking too long to do it. As a result, in low light such cameras will be less accurate with regard to AF.
A lower signal to noise ratio usually means the camera will apply more noise reduction in dim light, even at ISO 100, than it will in brighter light. Noise reduction tends to reduce image detail along with the noise.
Focusing, both auto and manual, are usually done when the aperture is wide open. The camera will only stop down to the selected aperture value the instant before the image is captured. The wider the aperture of the lens, the better the camera's autofocus can perform. Your 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 lens is relatively slow, especially on the telephoto end where wide open the aperture is only f/6.3. That's right on the fringe of what most cameras' PDAF systems are capable of using to AF at all. Even when shooting at narrower apertures, a wide aperture lens gives an advantage to AF systems over a narrower aperture one. You might try using Live View based contrast detection AF instead. It will probably be much slower in low light, but should be more accurate if you've managed to properly tell the camera where it is you wish it to focus. Your sample image, for example, is very well focused on the area with the highest amount of contrast in the scene at the extreme lower right.
Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user15871
8y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Several factors can make a superzoom look soft at 270mm, especially in dimmer light. Autofocus systems rely on contrast, so lower light and lower-contrast scenes give AF less to work with and can reduce accuracy. At the same time, image quality at 270mm and f/6.3 is near the most demanding end of this kind of lens, where sharpness is often weaker.
Your shutter speed is also marginal for 270mm. Even with stabilization, 1/100 sec can still allow blur from camera movement or subject movement, and long focal lengths magnify any small error. If manual focus isn’t much better, that points more toward overall softness from the shooting conditions or the lens at its long end, rather than AF alone.
Try this: shoot in bright light, use a faster shutter speed, stop down a little if possible, use a high-contrast target, and test from a tripod with stabilization off. Compare viewfinder AF, live view AF, and manual focus. If results are still consistently poor under controlled conditions, the lens may need service or calibration.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI8y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why is Darktable lens correction greyed out for a Tamron 18-270mm on Ubuntu?
Canon 600D: Tamron 18-270mm or Canon 18-135mm as a first lens?
Is a Tamron 18-270mm or Canon 75-300mm a good second lens after a 50mm f/1.8?
Why do my surfer shots start sharp and then go soft when using AI Servo on a Canon 7D?
Why do I get squiggly light streaks in 30-second exposures on a tripod?