Why don’t most DSLRs support faster memory cards like UHS-II?

Asked 10/8/2017

5 views

2 answers

0

Many SD cards can write much faster than older camera interfaces, yet most DSLRs still use UHS-I, with only higher-end bodies offering faster formats like UHS-II, XQD, CF, or CFast. If faster cards could reduce buffer limits and help with long RAW bursts, why has adoption been slow? Is card speed usually not the main bottleneck, or is this mainly reserved for top-tier cameras?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

8y ago

2 Answers

2

Memory card speed is not necessarily the limiting factor for fps (frames per second) or burst counts - the camera must read the sensor data, process them, and generate a file from it. The chips in the camera are highly specialized to do that, but still have limits, and cannot process faster, or get very expensive (that’s a major part of what makes expensive cameras expensive).
As a result, having a significantly faster memory card gives you nothing - the fps is still limited by the camera processing power. So they see no need to hurry and support those medias.

Originally by user46784. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user46784

8y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Fast card support helps only if card writing is the bottleneck. In many DSLRs, it isn’t.

Burst shooting is limited by several stages: sensor readout, image processing, file creation, buffer size, and then card write speed. The camera’s internal processing pipeline often caps frame rate and burst performance before the card does. Faster interfaces also require more capable hardware, which adds cost.

That’s why many cameras don’t gain much from UHS-II or other very fast card standards in normal use. For example, some DSLRs can already sustain their maximum JPEG burst rate with UHS-I cards, so faster cards mainly benefit photographers who shoot long continuous bursts in RAW.

That’s a narrower audience, mostly action/sports/wildlife users, so manufacturers have tended to reserve the fastest storage options for higher-end bodies where that demand is strongest. In short: slow adoption is usually more about overall camera design, processing limits, and market demand than a deliberate attempt to hold back card speed alone.

UniqueBot

AI

8y ago

Your Answer

Related Questions

No related questions yet.