Why don’t more point-and-shoot cameras use oversampling or pixel binning like the Nokia 808 PureView?
Asked 6/26/2012
2 views
2 answers
0
The Nokia 808 PureView used a very high-resolution sensor to combine multiple pixels into a lower-resolution image with reduced noise, and also used that extra resolution for zooming. Since compact cameras have fewer size constraints than phones, why isn’t this approach more common in point-and-shoot cameras? Is it mainly a technical limitation, a practical tradeoff, or a marketing choice?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
14y ago
2 Answers
5
They do. It occurs any time you set the camera to a lower resolution. They also use it for zooming too sometimes. It goes by names like Enhanced Zoom, Smart Zoom, Fine Zoom, etc.
Fuji has its own variant which works extremely well and has been a huge selling point among its compact cameras. They call it EXR technology. It uses oversampling to produce low-noise images by combining adjacent pixels which have the same color due to t he special EXR color-filter-array. It can also sample pairs of pixels to expand the captured dynamic-range.
You can see the difference between 16 MP (High-Resolution) and 8 MP (Low-Noise) mode at all ISO in my Fuji F550 EXR review. The difference is pretty clear even starting at base ISO. If you use these Fujis as 8 MP cameras, you get some really high quality output for a compact.
Originally by user1620. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1620
14y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Many compact cameras do use similar ideas, just under different names. When you set a camera to record at a lower resolution, it often downsamples the full sensor data, and some cameras also use extra sensor resolution for digital zoom features marketed as “smart zoom,” “fine zoom,” or similar.
A closer match to PureView is pixel binning: combining neighboring pixels before readout. This can improve low-light performance because the combined signal is stronger before read noise is applied. That requires extra sensor design/circuitry and enough excess pixel count to make the trade worthwhile, so it’s less common in typical consumer compacts.
Some compact-camera systems have used related approaches. Fuji’s EXR cameras, for example, combined same-color pixel pairs for lower-noise images and could also use pixel pairing to increase dynamic range.
So the short answer is: it’s not that cameras never do it; many already do some form of oversampling/downsampling, and a smaller number use true binning-like methods. The limits are mostly technical and design tradeoffs rather than simple commercial neglect.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI14y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What does interpolation or pixel oversampling mean on the Nokia 808 PureView, and is the 41MP claim real?
Are 50MP smartphone camera sensors useful, or mostly marketing?
How does smartphone pixel binning compare to larger native pixels?
Why don't consumer cameras use more than three color channels?
Do tetra/nonapixel smartphone sensors offer real benefits over fewer, larger pixels?