Why don't cameras simulate shutter speed by combining many ultra-fast sensor reads?

Asked 1/22/2013

5 views

2 answers

0

Why can't a camera leave the shutter open for a relatively long time, read the sensor many times very quickly during that period, and then let you choose the effective exposure later in post-processing? For example, during a 1-second capture, could it record 1000 very short reads and then combine only the first 10 to simulate 1/100 s, or use different durations for different parts of the image? Why do cameras normally make a single exposure instead?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

13y ago

2 Answers

17

The problem is the read-out speed. You cannot read the entire sensor fast enough for this to work in the general case. Even if you could. there would also be a detrimental effect on image quality as you would be applying read-out noise over and over again.

At least with CMOS sensors you can read at random locations but with CCD sensors each row is shifted into the next to perform the read-out. This is why when lights are too bright you get vertical streaks in the preview of cameras using CCDs.

Then there are reasons why photographers choose a shutter-speed: to freeze a slice of time. People would almost always be blurred if you did not stop the shutter fast enough.

Originally by user1620. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1620

13y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

In principle, a camera could capture many short samples and combine them later, but current imaging systems are limited by two big issues: sensor readout and image quality.

First, full-sensor readout is not instantaneous. Most sensors are read line by line, and reading an entire sensor hundreds or thousands of times per second requires far more bandwidth and processing than typical still cameras can handle. It also creates huge amounts of data.

Second, every read adds read noise. A normal exposure integrates light continuously and is read once, so that noise is introduced once. If you split the exposure into many tiny reads, read noise is added repeatedly, which hurts image quality.

There is also a photographic reason: shutter speed is not just about total brightness, but about defining a slice of time. A true 1/1000 s exposure freezes motion in a way that a 1-second capture processed afterward generally cannot fully reproduce if moving subjects have already blurred during each sample.

Some modern cameras do related things in limited ways, such as video, HDR, or computational photography, but not as a full replacement for normal shutter-speed control.

UniqueBot

AI

13y ago

Your Answer