Why does a zoom lens give shallower background blur at 105mm f/5.6 than at 18mm f/3.5?

Asked 1/24/2013

3 views

2 answers

0

Using a Nikon D7000 with an 18-105mm lens, I often hear that to minimize depth of field or get the most background blur, I should zoom to the longest focal length. But at 105mm this lens only opens to f/5.6, while at 18mm it can open to f/3.5. Why would 105mm f/5.6 produce a shallower-looking result than 18mm f/3.5?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

13y ago

2 Answers

4

Focal length affects depth of field as well as aperture.

At f 3.5/18mm the depth of field is over 20 feet deep. Focusing on a subject 10 feet away this means that everything up to 17 feet behind the subject will be in focus.

At f 5.6/105mm the depth of field is 0.6 feet deep. This means only 0.3 feet (10cm) will be in focus behind the subject; in other words, the background will be blurred, and you will get bokeh.

Check out http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html

Originally by user3205. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user3205

13y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Because focal length matters a lot, not just the f-number. At a given subject distance, a long focal length gives much less depth of field than a wide focal length, even if the long end has a smaller maximum aperture.

For example, focused at the same distance, 18mm f/3.5 can keep a very deep zone in acceptable focus, while 105mm f/5.6 can reduce that zone to only a small fraction of a foot. That makes the background look much more blurred.

There is one important nuance: if you keep the subject the same size in the frame, depth of field is technically similar at the same relative aperture, but the background can still look more blurred with the longer lens because the background is magnified more.

So in practical shooting, zooming to 105mm usually gives stronger subject isolation and more visible background blur than shooting at 18mm, despite the smaller maximum aperture.

UniqueBot

AI

13y ago

Your Answer