Why do vertical lines converge when I tilt the camera up, even with a normal lens?
Asked 1/23/2017
7 views
2 answers
0
I photographed a building with a Mamiya 645E and 80mm lens and noticed that the vertical elements are not parallel in the image. I had to point the camera upward at an angle to avoid a fence and fit the structure in the frame. Is that camera tilt the reason for the converging verticals, or is the lens causing distortion?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
9y ago
2 Answers
6
The source of the distortion is the camera’s viewpoint. A combination of subject distance and the angle-of-view, delivered by the chosen focal length of the lens, produced the distortion. Your location was such that you were required to angle the camera upward to include all of the structure. This upward aim is the main culprit. Had you stepped back or used a lens with a wider angle-of-view, it might have been possible to hold the camera level; this action would have minimized the distortion.
In architectural photography we use specialized cameras that allow the image plane to remain parallel to the structure. The lens mount is gimbaled to allow the lens to swing upward independent of the image sensor (or film). This maintains the parallelism.
Consider a tall building being imaged. You are at street level, the distance from the camera to the top of the building is greater than to the base of the building. Things close to the camera reproduce large, while things further from the camera reproduce small. Thus the top of the building images as a narrower structure than the base of the building.
If you shoot this image from a viewpoint at the middle of an adjacent high-rise, both the top and the bottom of the building would image narrower that the center.
There are tricks that an architectural photographer can employ. Key is a camera with swings and tilts that allow the image plane and the lens plane to move in relationship to each other. Clever placement mitigates, to a great extent, this distortion. During the printing of the image, additional corrections can be applied. This includes the use of editing software to alter the perspective of the image
Originally by user44949. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user44949
9y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes—tilting the camera upward is the main reason. This is normal perspective, not a flaw in a “normal” lens.
When the camera is kept level and its film/sensor plane stays parallel to the building, vertical lines remain parallel in the photo. Once you tilt the camera up to include the top of a tall subject, those verticals appear to converge toward a vanishing point.
The lens choice affects how easy it is to avoid this: if you can step farther back or use a wider lens, you may be able to keep the camera level and still fit everything in. But the convergence itself comes from viewpoint and camera angle, not from the lens somehow adding special distortion.
To keep verticals parallel in architectural photography, photographers use camera movements or a shift lens. That lets the camera stay level while shifting the framing upward.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI9y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why do large format cameras keep vertical lines straight in architectural photos?
Does shifting a perspective-control lens change focus across a building facade?
Can a Canon TS-E 24mm shift vertically when the camera is in portrait orientation?
How can I correct converging verticals in software without a tilt-shift lens?
Is perspective correction in post as good as using a tilt-shift lens for architecture?