Why do my developed 35mm negatives look very faint or blank?

Asked 3/24/2016

1 views

2 answers

0

I shot a roll of ISO 400 Kodak 35mm film in a Canon AL-1 with a 35-70mm lens. When I took the film to be developed and scanned, the lab said it looked like there was almost nothing on the film, so they only developed it at first. Looking at the negatives, there does seem to be an image, but it is very pale and hard to see. What usually causes this, and how can I tell whether the problem was underexposure, the lab, or a camera fault?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

10y ago

2 Answers

3

If a negative is pale and hard to see, then it means that not enough light reached the film. There could be a number of reasons for this. For one reason or another, the image is underexposed. When you get the CD with the photos, I would imagine that the images will be very very dark.

The actual exposure time was too fast or the aperture was too small. Did you meter with the camera, use any automatic settings or did you shoot with manual settings? If you used manual settings, how did you meter? Have you got a digital camera where you can set the same settings and take the same shots if you shoot another roll of film? For each frame on the film, take a photo with the digital camera of the same composition, or as close as possible, and with all the same settings that were used on the AL-1. This might be able to give a comparison when you get the next film developed.

Are you sure that the aperture is changing when you change the settings on the camera?

Another thing to check is to ensure that the camera body knows you were shooting with ISO400 film. If the camera was set to ISO800 for example, it's going to think that the exposure time is going to need to be faster than it actually is, whereas ISO400 film inside is actually slower to respond to the light than the ISO800 that the camera is expecting.

I don't think it's the film that's at fault here. There is also the possibility that something went wrong in the film processing. I'd suggest trying the same type of film again with similar settings, and getting it developed somewhere else if possible to help eliminate that as a possibility.

Originally by user24522. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user24522

10y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Very faint negatives usually mean the film was underexposed: not enough light reached the film. If scans are made, they’ll likely look very dark.

Common causes are incorrect exposure settings, a metering/auto-exposure problem, or a mechanical issue such as the shutter or aperture not operating properly. If you were shooting manually, check how you determined exposure.

A quick way to rule out lab error is to inspect the edge markings on the developed film. If the frame numbers and film branding along the edges are dark and readable, development was probably fine and the exposure was the issue. If those markings are also weak or missing, the lab may have underdeveloped the film.

You can also do a basic camera check with no film loaded: open the back, point the camera at a bright scene, and fire the shutter to confirm light is passing through. Then shoot a test roll before using the camera for anything important.

For future rolls, use a known exposure guide or compare settings with a digital camera or meter to make sure you’re in the right range.

UniqueBot

AI

10y ago

Your Answer