Why do movie scenes look clean in low light while my photos are noisy or blurry?
Asked 9/15/2017
4 views
2 answers
0
Movie scenes can look very dark and atmospheric, yet still appear clean and sharp, while my low-light cave and phone photos often end up noisy or blurred. If films are shot around 1/24 second per frame, why don’t they suffer the same problems? What’s fundamentally different between cinematic low-light shooting and still photography in genuinely dark conditions?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
8y ago
2 Answers
12
Why are my low light photos noisy/blurry, but Alien is perfect?
There's a world of difference between creating a dark image and creating an image in the dark!
The scenes in a Ridley Scott sci-fi movie like Alien are often dark, but that doesn't mean that the set looked that way when the scene was shot. Directors and cinematographers think a lot about exactly how they want a scene to look, and they know how much light they need to use in order to get the result they want with the particular lens, camera, and film that they're using. The scenes in Alien (and Blade Runner, etc.) aren't dark because there wasn't much light; they're dark because Scott wanted them to be dark, and he* used as much light as he needed to get that look on film.
It sounds like you, on the other hand, are trying to photograph some found scene that looks to you like something out of a Ridley Scott film, and you're disappointed when your shot doesn't work out the way you see it. That's an entirely different situation -- you're trying to work within the limitations of the light that's already there, and that forces you to make some compromises. Look at the shutter speed, aperture, and ISO settings of one of your disappointing shots. What if you could take the same shot, but at a shutter speed of 1/250s instead of 1/15s? And what if you could use ISO 100 instead of 1600? The shorter exposure and lower ISO should solve any blur and noise problems. However, if you want the exposure to be the same you'd have to compensate by adding 8 stops of light! Ridley Scott can do that in a studio, but you probably can't in the scene you're shooting.
his film looks amazing and my cave photos are naff
Don't take it too hard -- he was working with a budget of $10 million (that was a lot in 1978), a team of highly trained professionals, and a camera that gave significantly more control than the one in your smartphone. On the other hand, people back in the 1970's didn't carry supercomputers in their pockets. You may not have the resources of a film production company, but you might be able to get closer to what you want with the right combination of smartphone and software. For example, consider Apple's recent announcement of the iPhone 8 and iPhone X and their new low light and portrait photography features.
*Decisions about exactly how much light to use and where to put it in order to achieve the look Scott wanted were surely made by cinematographer Derek Vanlint, not by Scott himself.
Originally by user4262. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user4262
8y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
What looks like “shot in the dark” often isn’t. Cinematographers usually add as much light as needed, then shape it so the final image looks dark. In other words, they create a dark-looking image, not necessarily an image captured with very little light.
A few other differences help:
- Better cameras/sensors can produce cleaner high-ISO images.
- Professional post-processing can reduce visible noise.
- In motion pictures, 24 frames per second can make noise less noticeable to viewers than in a single still image.
- Techniques like suppressing ambient light can make scenes appear darker than they really were.
Your cave or phone photos are likely being made in genuinely low light, where the camera must use slower shutter speeds, higher ISO, or both. Slow shutter speeds cause blur; high ISO increases noise.
So yes, the fundamental difference is lighting control. Film productions carefully light scenes to get a “dark” look while still giving the camera enough exposure. If you want cleaner low-light stills, the main solutions are more light, a steadier camera/subject, a camera with better high-ISO performance, and thoughtful noise reduction in post.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI8y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why are my indoor and zoomed photos blurry and noisy on a Canon PowerShot?
How can I photograph the Milky Way without dark, noisy, blurry stars?
Why do bright lights cause glow in night HDR photos, and can HDR capture the full range?
How can I reduce noise in low-light photos with a Canon PowerShot A510?
How can I photograph shiny chrome or gold lapel pins straight on without camera reflections?