Why do many printers list different DPI values in each direction, like 1200×600 or 4800×1200?
Asked 5/6/2023
1 views
2 answers
0
Many printers are specified with asymmetric resolution such as 1200×600, 2400×600, or 4800×1200 dpi. That seems to imply the printer can place far more dots in one direction than the other, unlike square image pixels on a display. Why does this happen in printers, and why doesn’t it make prints look distorted or blocky?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
3y ago
2 Answers
5
You are confusing a lot of things. Let me try to explain a bit.
PPI and DPI are not the same units. A Pixel is an information unit. The values of color on one location of an image. And a Dot is... a dot. A tiny droplet of ink.
Dots are not squares, rectangles, circles, or ellipses. They are droplets of random shapes dictated mainly by the absorption of the fibers of the paper.
One reason for the printers having different DPI on the horizontal axis, vs the vertical axis is that they are controlled by two different mechanisms. The X-axis is controlled by a moving printer head on a lane, or a laser beam shoot by a rotating mirror. The Y axis is controlled by rollers or a rotating drum. If you wanted the same DPI on both axes you would get the smaller number, because one mechanism is rougher than the other (600x600 print instead of 1200x600 for example). But you want smaller dots by overall area so if you can make them smaller even in only one direction, do it. They are so small that you do not see the shape.
for the entire page
No, they are Per Inch. That is what the second P and the I mean. 1200 dots each inch.
Why don't printers print square pixels by default?
A printer will print a pixel on whatever aspect ratio the image has. It has nothing to do with how many DPI they print.
Imagine these images are 5x5 pixels. You can squish or squash the image, so the pixels are no longer square. The printer will print them accordingly.
Here is a simulation of different DPI Two sets of checkerboard of the same size printed in different dot sizes. Simply means, smaller dots or bigger dots. (In this simulation I have little squares, but they will be random shapes on a real print)
And here is a simulation of two different PPI using the same image.
The first image has 5 pixels on one inch. The second one has 2.5 pixels on one inch.
Here is another simulation
In order to clearly see it, you need to open it on a new tab at 100% so it is not scaled inside this post on your browser. The image is optimized to be viewed on a Full HD monitor.
The first image has black and white dots of 1 pixel, simulating a print of "X DPI" Let me put an example number. 100 DPI.
The second image has twice bigger dots. It has X/2 DPI or 50 DPI. Each square is 2x2 pixels.
The third image has vertical rectangles as dots. It is simulating a resolution of, let's say 100x50 DPI. Each dot is 1x2 pixels.
If you move away from the screen, you will not really notice the rectangular dots, but you will appreciate the improvement in detail compared to image 2.
https://www.pexels.com/es-es/foto/hombre-persona-ojos-cara-4556737/
Originally by user37321. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user37321
3y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Printer DPI does not mean the printer is using rectangular “pixels.” It describes how finely the printer can place ink or toner dots, and those dots are not square image elements in the first place.
The two directions are often controlled by different mechanisms. One axis is set by the print head or laser scanning system, while the other is set by paper feed rollers or a drum. Those systems have different mechanical limits, so one direction can usually be positioned more finely than the other.
Also, PPI and DPI are different: image pixels are units of image data, while printer dots are tiny physical marks used to reproduce tone and detail. A single image pixel may be rendered using multiple dots. Printers also use the finer axis for placement, edge smoothing, and halftoning rather than treating it like a simple 1:1 pixel grid.
That’s why prints still look normal. The printer is not stretching the image 8:1; it is placing physical dots with different positional precision in each direction. The actual ink or toner marks also spread on paper, so perfect square dots would not exist in practice anyway.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI3y ago



