Why do many high-end compact cameras omit built-in GPS?
Asked 9/18/2012
2 views
2 answers
0
Recent premium compact cameras such as the Sony RX100, Canon G15, Nikon P7700, Olympus XZ-2, and Panasonic LX7 often shipped without built-in GPS, and some newer models even dropped it. Why would manufacturers leave out GPS in this camera class when geotagging can be very useful? Is the main reason battery drain, cost, product planning, or something else?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
13y ago
2 Answers
10
The answer is simpler than you think. GPS is not included because the manufacturer does not feel it would sell more cameras. It's the same reason they skimp on camera straps. If it does not sell more cameras, it is not needed, the manufacturer can sell it for less - even just a bit less - or pocket the difference.
Personally I could not care less about in-camera GPS but I understand it is something some people like and its even useful to some people. The original solution was to have GPS modules but they are cumbersome, stick out in odd places or keep the hot-shoe busy. However, WiFi which is starting to appear in cameras, now allows to get GPS data from another device much more conveniently. Not all WiFi cameras can do this yet but it has started and I suspect more of this is coming soon. It will allow users to bind the GPS of their choice to their cameras, rather than using the one placed in the camera by the manufacturer.
In the case of high-end compacts, manufacturers have to be very economical while putting in the features needed to make it high-end because of competition from mirrorless cameras (and entry-level DSLRs to a lesser extent). Only a few models like the Fuji X100 have managed to command a truly premium price and still sell enough to justify, although volumes are still very low compared to a Canon S100 for example.
Originally by user1620. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1620
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
The most likely reason is a mix of product planning and battery-life tradeoffs. Built-in GPS adds cost and complexity, and manufacturers only tend to include features they believe will help sell more cameras or improve profit. If buyers in this segment don’t strongly prioritize GPS, it’s an easy feature to cut.
Battery life is also a real issue. Community experience with cameras that did include GPS suggests it can drain batteries quickly, especially if the camera keeps updating location while powered on or in standby. That matters more on compact cameras, where battery capacity is limited.
A further factor is implementation: camera makers have not always been great at software and power management, so making GPS work well without hurting battery life may be harder than it seems. As Wi‑Fi became more common, manufacturers also had another path: using a phone or other device to supply location data instead of building GPS into the camera itself.
So the short answer is: manufacturers likely judged that built-in GPS was not worth the added cost, battery drain, and development effort for most buyers in that category.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
No related questions yet.