Why do Lightroom previews look different from exported sRGB JPEGs on an sRGB monitor?
Asked 4/18/2012
5 views
2 answers
0
My monitor is calibrated and can only display roughly the sRGB gamut. In Lightroom, a RAW photo looks one way, but after I export it as a JPEG in sRGB, the exported file does not look the same. I expected them to match, since the screen cannot show colors beyond sRGB anyway. Why can Lightroom’s preview of a RAW image still differ from an exported sRGB JPEG on the same monitor?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
14y ago
2 Answers
10
Color management is an annoyance that I've recently been learning about; it is not completely accurate to say that just because your monitor can only display sRGB that it's meaningless for your photos to be edited in the AdobeRGB or ProPhotoRGB space. What is actually happening is that Lightroom is translating colors from ProPhotoRGB into the sRGB space that your monitor can display. It does a bunch of fancy math (I think maybe some matrix algebra? I'm not positive, though, maybe somebody can correct me) to perform this translation -- thus, what you see in Lightroom is not your image as it appears in ProPhotoRGB or in sRGB, you are seeing an interpretation of ProPhotoRGB space in sRGB that tries to be as faithful as possible to what the image would look like on a device capable of displaying ProPhotoRGB.
When you export your photos from LR, you have the option of choosing what color space you want to use for the exported photo (you can choose sRGB, AdobeRGB, and ProPhotoRGB, among others). When LR does this, it first converts the photo into the chosen color space, and embeds information into the JPEG file describing the color space (these things are called ICC profiles). Now, when you open the JPEG in some other program, if that program is able to understand the embedded color space information, it can perform the same math that LR does to convert the file into your monitor's color space, and it should appear the same (or at least similar to) LR. If the program you open it in can interpret this embedded color space information, we say that it's a color-managed application.
The problem is that a lot of applications are not color-managed. Windows Photo Viewer may or may not be (I've read competing statements, but in any case it doesn't seem to work as well as LR); Firefox only supports old versions of ICC profiles, Safari and IE are, and Chrome is not. So if you open up your image in one of those applications that doesn't support color profiles, or doesn't support them well, your image is going to look bad because the proper color translation isn't being performed.
There's a really nice three-part series on color management here. You can also check out whether the device you're displaying supports the appropriate ICC color profiles using this test image. One other really neat feature of Photoshop CS5 (and maybe other editors too, I don't know) is that it will actually show you what parts of your image won't translate color spaces well; if you press Ctrl+Shift+Y, or go to View->Gamut Warning, it will highlight in grey the colors of the open image that don't exist in the target color space. I've found this to be somewhat useful.
Originally by user9104. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user9104
14y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Because Lightroom is not simply showing the RAW file “as-is” in sRGB. RAW files don’t have a fixed display color space in the same way a JPEG does, and Lightroom uses its own wide-gamut internal working space when rendering them. It then color-manages that preview to your monitor profile.
When you export to sRGB, Lightroom must convert the image from that wider internal space into the smaller sRGB gamut. That conversion can change how some colors and tones are mapped, even if your monitor itself only shows about sRGB. In other words, the Lightroom preview is a color-managed interpretation of the RAW data, while the exported JPEG is a different, already-converted version of that image.
Also, there is no single “RGB” color space—sRGB and Adobe RGB are different RGB spaces. A calibrated monitor profile helps software display files correctly, but it does not make all color-space conversions look identical.
So nothing is necessarily wrong: the difference comes from Lightroom’s wide-gamut rendering and the conversion to sRGB during export.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI14y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why do colors look different on a wide-gamut monitor after exporting to JPEG?
What color space does Lightroom use in the Develop module, and why export in ProPhoto or Adobe RGB?
Why do exported JPEGs look correct only in sRGB, but shift in Adobe RGB or ProPhoto RGB?
Why does my exported sRGB JPEG look oversaturated in some Windows apps but correct in Photoshop and Firefox?
Why do Lightroom exports look different from the Develop preview on my monitor?