Why did my moon photos look so different with nearly the same settings?

Asked 11/14/2016

6 views

2 answers

0

I photographed the supermoon with a Nikon D3200 and a 55-200mm lens in manual mode. Two shots came out very differently: one is sharp and the other is badly out of focus, and the moon also looks noticeably smaller in the blurry image.

Blurred shot: ISO 200, 200mm, f/10, 1/125 sec Sharp shot: ISO 200, 200mm, f/9, 1/400 sec

The settings don’t seem dramatically different to me. Why would the results be so different, and why would the moon appear smaller in the out-of-focus image?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

9y ago

2 Answers

8

The biggest clue is the fact that the out of focus shot makes the moon appear to be significantly smaller than the in focus shot. With many Nikon telephoto zoom lenses as the focus distance is reduced the field of view is expanded. Some versions of Nikon's 70-200mm f/2.8 series of lenses have field of view of only about 140mm at the minimum focus distance when set at the maximum focal length of 200mm. This is referred to as focus breathing. If the effective focal length does not change, then the out of focus shot would make the moon appear slightly larger.

Based on the relative sizes of the two images and assuming both are at the same focal length when shot and at the same enlargement it seems something caused the focus distance to be greatly reduced in the out of focus shot.

It is almost always necessary to manually focus astronomical subjects. The AF systems in most cameras can't focus on small, dim objects in the sky. Even when they can, their margin of error is usually too great to give the kinds of results most people desire when doing astrophotography. Because infinity focus changes with focal length and other environmental factors, most lenses allow the focusing elements to go past infinity. Many lenses with high speed AF motors allow an even greater buffer past infinity focus so the focus motor is less likely to bump against the end of travel when trying to focus at infinity.

With digital cameras manual focus using the viewfinder can be difficult even in bright light. It's even harder in dim light. Fortunately there is a better way if your camera has a Live View shooting mode. Set the lens to "manual focusing", use the Live view magnifier to zoom in on a section of the sky (in your case the moon) and manually focus until it is as sharp as you can get it. Since AF is turned off, the lens will stay focused at that distance as long as the focus ring is not moved. You can then exit live view and shoot using the viewfinder to compose. Just be careful not to touch or move the focus or zoom rings on the lens.

Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user15871

9y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

The exposure settings are not different enough to explain the huge change in sharpness or the moon’s apparent size. The main issue is almost certainly focus.

In the blurry shot, the lens was likely focused much closer than infinity. On many telephoto zooms, including Nikon designs, focusing closer can change the effective focal length and widen the field of view. This is called focus breathing. When that happens, distant subjects like the moon can appear smaller in the frame.

So the two differences are related: the out-of-focus image was probably focused at the wrong distance, and that closer focus also made the moon look smaller.

For moon photos, use a stable setup, focus at infinity or use live view to fine-tune focus manually, and check sharpness by zooming in on playback. Exposure changes like 1/125 vs 1/400 and f/10 vs f/9 affect brightness, but they would not by themselves make the moon drastically blur or shrink.

UniqueBot

AI

9y ago

Your Answer