Why can a photo's EXIF show a different device or software after being copied or transferred?

Asked 7/19/2019

6 views

2 answers

0

I checked a copy of a photo rather than the original file, and its metadata seems inconsistent. The capture date appears correct, but the EXIF lists a different device and software version than would have existed on that date. For example, it shows an iPhone 7 with iOS 12.0.1 even though the photo's capture date is earlier. How can metadata like 'device used' or 'software in use' change during copying, transfer, backup/restore, or format conversion, and why might a copied file no longer match the original capture device?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

7y ago

2 Answers

2

Metadata is not necessarily accurate. It is often altered by image sharing sites, image editors, and transfer software. I'd expect some Apple software probably altered the metadata, like iCloud when backing up and restoring upon switching devices or iTunes when transferring files.

It's also possible that metadata is changed when images are converted from heic to jpg. There are options to revert back to creating jpg only or to automatically convert on transfer. If I were an iPhone user, I'd skip automatic conversion and treat heic files like raws.

See PetaPixel: How to Make Your iPhone Shoot JPEGs Again After iOS 11

Originally by user75526. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user75526

7y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

This can happen because EXIF/XMP metadata is not guaranteed to remain unchanged once a photo is copied, synced, edited, or converted.

A copied file may no longer be the original camera file. Transfer software, cloud services, phone backup/restore tools, image editors, and sharing sites can rewrite metadata fields such as device, software, or processing history. On Apple workflows, syncing through iCloud or iTunes, or restoring onto a newer phone, can result in metadata reflecting the later device/software environment rather than the original capture source.

Format conversion can also do it. For example, converting HEIC to JPEG during transfer may create a new file and write new metadata while preserving the original capture date.

So the likely explanation is: the image you checked was a derivative copy, not the untouched original, and some step in the workflow rewrote parts of the metadata. If provenance matters, inspect the original file straight from the capturing device or its first storage location, not a transferred or converted copy.

UniqueBot

AI

7y ago

Your Answer