Why can a camera shoot a still at 1/4000s, but high-frame-rate video requires expensive cameras?

Asked 2/6/2016

3 views

2 answers

0

I’m confused about the difference between a very short still-photo shutter speed and true high-speed video. A camera might let you take a still at 1/4000s, but cameras that record hundreds or thousands of frames per second are usually very expensive. Also, people often say to use a dark room and flash to freeze motion. Why is that necessary if a fast shutter in bright light can already freeze motion?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

10y ago

2 Answers

9

So, why a dark place and a flash is to be required to freeze the motion (take a high speed photo) though in a bright place with a, say, 1/4000th of a second, we can take a high speed photo?

This is because the flash sync speed, the maximum shutter speed at which the entire image sensor is exposed at the same time, is much slower than 1/4000s. On a typical DSLR, the sync speed is around 1/200s. If you take a photo at that speed in a bright environment, a lot of ambient light will be recorded and you get significant motion blur. If you take the photo in a dark place, there's less ambient light and almost all the light comes from the flash, which is much shorter in duration than the shutter speed.

The reason that the sync speed is so much less than the maximum shutter speed is that most cameras use a curtain shutter which takes time to travel over the sensor. At speeds above the sync speed, the shutter's second curtain starts to cover the sensor before the first curtain has finished exposing it; at very high speeds like 1/4000s, the two curtains are so close that there's only a narrow slit between them to allow light to pass. It still takes around 1/200s for the entire sensor to be exposed, but any portion of the sensor is exposed for only the specified 1/4000s.

If you're taking a photo of something moving quickly, then you really want to expose the whole sensor at the same time. Otherwise, the subject will be moving while different parts of the sensor are exposed, and that causes distorted images. So, you really want to shoot at the flash sync speed, but you want the actual exposure to be faster than that; the way to accomplish that is to remove all the light except the flash.

Why only camcorders that cost too much can record high fps (freeze motion)?

There are really two questions here. I've addressed what I think is your main question, about stopping motion, above. The term fps, though, stands for frames per second. You sometimes see fps used in relation to a given DSLR's ability to shoot in burst mode, where the camera takes photos as fast as it can for as long as you hold the shutter release button. For a DSLR, 12-14 fps is very fast. That rate has little to do with the camera's shutter speed or motion stopping capabilities.

A true high speed camera records video frames so fast that no mechanical shutter could ever keep up. These cameras have single-frame exposure times as short as 1 microsecond and can record hundreds of thousands of frames per second. To make that happen, they naturally need extremely fast sensors and analog to digital converters, multiple processors working in parallel, and hundreds of gigabytes of fast built-in memory. That's a lot of expensive technology aimed at a fairly small market, making it even more expensive.

So, it's important to understand that a high speed video camera is something quite different from a regular old DSLR or camcorder. While you can stop some pretty fast motion for a single image using a flash in a dark room, recording high speed video that would let you see an entire process in extreme motion requires an entirely different approach.

Originally by user4262. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user4262

10y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

A 1/4000s still exposure and 1000+ fps video are different problems.

For a still photo, the camera only needs to expose one frame briefly. A mechanical shutter can cut off the light after 1/4000s, and the sensor can take longer afterward to read out that single image.

For high-speed video, the camera must not only expose each frame, but also read the sensor, process the data, and store it again and again every tiny fraction of a second. That requires a very fast sensor readout and a lot of processing/storage bandwidth, which is why true high-speed cameras are expensive.

Flash is used to freeze motion because the flash burst itself can be much shorter than the shutter speed. On many cameras, normal flash sync is only around 1/200s, not 1/4000s, because the whole sensor is not exposed at once at faster shutter speeds. In bright ambient light at 1/200s, motion blur from the ambient light can still show. In a dark room, ambient light is minimized, so the very short flash duration becomes the effective exposure and freezes the motion.

UniqueBot

AI

10y ago

Your Answer