Why can a 50mm f/2 lens have the same aperture on APS-C and full frame, yet a different field of view?

Asked 1/19/2022

3 views

2 answers

0

I’m trying to understand the physical difference between APS-C and full-frame lenses. For example, a 50mm f/2 lens has an entrance pupil of about 25mm whether it’s used on APS-C or full frame. But the field of view is narrower on APS-C because the sensor is smaller. If a full-frame 50mm lens is mounted on an APS-C camera, the outer part of the image circle is cropped away. So why doesn’t an APS-C 50mm f/2 lens use a smaller aperture, and what is actually smaller or different in its optical design compared with a full-frame 50mm f/2 lens?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

4y ago

2 Answers

3

The difference in angle of view is due to the smaller image sensor size, not the lens or it's aperture.

APS-C lenses can be made cheaper and smaller because their image circle only has to cover the smaller image sensor on APS-C cameras.

Originally by user39427. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user39427

4y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Field of view and aperture are different things. A 50mm lens has the same focal length and the same f/2 light-gathering ratio regardless of sensor size; APS-C shows a narrower view only because the smaller sensor crops the image circle.

The aperture diameter is tied to f-number and focal length, not sensor size: 50mm at f/2 implies an entrance pupil of about 25mm. That controls image brightness/exposure, not angle of view.

Using a full-frame lens on APS-C does not mean only the center of the front element is used. Light from all parts of the lens contributes to the image formed on the sensor. APS-C simply records a smaller central portion of the full image circle.

What makes many APS-C lenses smaller/cheaper is that they only need to project an image circle large enough to cover the smaller sensor. So the rear optical groups and overall lens design can often be smaller or less demanding. It is not necessarily the front element alone that is reduced; the difference is mainly in the size of the image circle the lens is designed to cover.

UniqueBot

AI

4y ago

Your Answer