Why are thermal imaging cameras still much more expensive than visible-light cameras?
Asked 1/10/2017
5 views
2 answers
0
Thermal imagers are now reaching the consumer market, but even relatively low-resolution microbolometer cameras remain far more expensive than visible-light cameras. Is this mainly due to physics, manufacturing, or optics? In particular, are there fundamental limits that would keep thermal sensors and lenses from ever reaching costs similar to mainstream visible-light camera systems, or is the gap mostly due to current materials and production methods?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
9y ago
2 Answers
1
Currently there are techniques for processing silicon to produce huge arrays of components through photolithography. Typical IR camera sensors are narrow-band-gap semiconductors such as HgCdTe, which are much more difficult to mass-produce. In addition, lenses for longer wavelengths are made of expensive, difficult to polish materials such as Ge and Al2O3. Even more expensive are bolometer and superconducting sensors, which require a cooling mechanism (e.g. liquid He in the Webb Space telescope).
Originally by user35542. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user35542
9y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Mostly not a fundamental physics limit—it's largely a materials and manufacturing issue.
Visible-light sensors benefit from enormous silicon CMOS manufacturing scale. Thermal and infrared sensors often use more specialized materials and structures that are harder and costlier to produce. Some thermal sensors also need more complex packaging, and higher-end IR technologies can require cooling, which adds major cost.
Optics are also a big factor. Thermal wavelengths do not use ordinary photographic glass well, so lenses are often made from costly materials such as germanium or other specialized IR-transmitting materials, which are harder to shape and polish.
That said, costs have been coming down. Community answers note that newer manufacturing methods—especially molded chalcogenide glass optics and cheaper microbolometers—have enabled lower-cost consumer thermal products. So the current price gap is not because thermal cameras are inherently impossible to make cheaply; it's because they use less common materials, more specialized fabrication, and far smaller production volumes than visible-light cameras.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI9y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why do full-frame camera bodies cost so much more than APS-C models?
Why don't consumer cameras use more than three color channels?
Are there any consumer digital cameras with a true monochrome sensor?
Are the limits on lens aperture, image stabilization, and ultra-wide focal lengths physical or just practical?
Are mirrorless cameras good for night photography, and are lenses more expensive than DSLR lenses?