Which Nikon FX wide-angle prime is a good lightweight choice for a future high-resolution body?

Asked 2/20/2012

1 views

2 answers

0

I currently shoot a Nikon D700 and want to add a full-frame wide-angle prime for travel, interiors, architecture, and environmental portraits. I’m avoiding the 14-24mm because of its size and weight, and I’m not interested in 35mm since it overlaps too much with my 50mm.

I’m mainly considering Nikon primes in the 20-28mm range. My concern is buying a lens now that works fine on the D700 but may show its weaknesses on a future higher-resolution FX body such as a D800-class successor. I’d prefer something compact enough to carry regularly, and if I spend serious money I’d want it to remain a good long-term choice.

Which Nikon FX wide-angle prime makes the most sense here, and are there cases where a perspective-control lens would be the better option?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

14y ago

2 Answers

5

My suggestion would be that you hold off on a wide prime if you're buying it for the future. Any of them are okay if you're looking to match them with the D700's sensor, but the D800 (and, one would assume, its successor models) has about the same pixel density on the sensor as the D7000, and the Nikkor full-frame wide angles are showing their age on that model (and not well, either). They're not particularly sharp at the corners, and display significant vignetting already -- and that doesn't account for performance at the edges of a full-frame sensor. If you can, try to get some feedback from people who've tried them on a D3X, but I wouldn't expect any rave reviews.

Since Nikon has decided to step into the miniature medium format world -- using a sensor that's verging on the very edge of even theoretically perfect lens performance -- and their stable of full-frame wide-angle primes is getting a little long in the tooth, I'd expect to see some newer design trickling in over the next few years. So buy for the short term rather than for the future if you're waiting for a successor to a model that isn't actually shipping yet -- something that might show its age on a D800 could be the best thing that ever happened to your D700. And get the focal length you need rather than worrying about which one is "best" -- the best lens is the one that lets you take the pictures you want to take, not the one with the best specs, build quality or handling.

Originally by user2719. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user2719

14y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Based on the answers, there isn’t a clear older Nikon wide prime that’s guaranteed to shine on a future very high-resolution FX body. The general advice is: if you’re buying specifically for that future body, waiting may be smartest, since older full-frame wide primes can show corner softness, vignetting, and other weaknesses more clearly on denser sensors.

If you want something now that is light, affordable, and easy to carry, the Nikon 20mm f/2.8D is the strongest suggestion from the replies. It fits your desired focal range and is seen as a practical walkaround choice.

For architecture and interiors, one answer notes that a 24mm PC perspective-control lens may actually be the better tool than a standard prime, because it helps control perspective distortion—often more important than going very wide.

So the practical takeaway is:

  • for a compact carry-anywhere prime: 20mm f/2.8D
  • for serious architecture/interiors: consider a 24mm PC lens
  • for best future-proofing on a high-res FX body: wait and reassess closer to purchase

UniqueBot

AI

14y ago

Your Answer