Which Nikon DX zoom is best for handheld indoor and general use: 18-200mm VR or a two-lens kit?
Asked 7/28/2010
2 views
2 answers
0
I shoot Nikon DX with a D300s and D70. My current lenses are 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5, Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6, and Sigma 30mm f/1.4. I want better coverage for general shooting and an upcoming all-day event with both indoor and outdoor people photos.
I’m considering:
- Nikon 18-200mm VR
- Nikon 18-105mm VR + 55-200mm VR
- Nikon 16-85mm VR + 55-200mm VR
- or another option
My main subjects are landscapes, trees, and general handheld shooting, but this event will involve people in mixed lighting. Is the 18-200mm VR the best choice, or would another lens setup be better for indoor/low-light use?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
16y ago
2 Answers
6
It sounds like you want to be photographing people, and VR won't help anywhere near as much as a fast aperture for that kind of indoor photography.
For example, based on this exposure calculator, your shutter speed at ISO 1600 under "domestic interiors at night" lighting will be 1/15 at f/5.6 and 1/30 at f/4 -- neither of which is fast enough to stop even modest human motion, and VR won't help with that. Keep in mind that those zooms are only f/3.5 or f/4 at the very widest focal lengths.
I believe your options are:
- Fast prime (e.g. 50mm f/1.8 or 85mm f/1.8), which would be well within your budget.
- Pro f/2.8 zoom, which is not in your budget for buying but probably is for renting.
The former would get you a shutter speed of ~1/180 and VR won't be necessary. You could probably even back off the ISO a bit.
w.r.t. More Details
None of the lenses you propose can be relied on to get good portraits inside. You may get lucky (e.g., exceptionally bright, people very still) but if you're being relied on as an event photographer, that's a huge risk. Keep in mind you'll be shooting at f/5.6 if you zoom in much. And VR can't be relied on for shake-free shots at 1/15 and 1/30; you'll have a higher hit rate, but it's no guarantee. Nikon will claim 4 stops improvement in workable shutter speed, but it's uncommon to actually get that.
I recommend you read this blog post over at LensRentals. It covers common mistakes for first-time event photographers, and I'm concerned that a number of them may be developing already.
Originally by user27. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user27
16y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
For indoor people shots, VR is not the main solution. It reduces camera shake, but it does not stop subject movement, so slow f/3.5-5.6 zooms can still give blurry people in low light.
Based on the answers, the best guidance is:
- If your priority is indoor/event photography of people, add a fast lens instead of relying on VR. A 50mm f/1.8 or 85mm f/1.8 is a much better low-light choice. A 70-200mm f/2.8 with stabilization would also suit portraits/head shots, but is a bigger-budget option.
- If your priority is convenience for travel, landscapes, and general walk-around use, the Nikon 18-200mm VR is the most recommended of your zoom options. It’s versatile and convenient, but still relatively slow in low light.
So: for the event, a fast prime is the most useful purchase. For everyday one-lens convenience, the 18-200mm VR is a good choice.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI16y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Which Nikon DX lens upgrade makes sense for landscapes: 18-200 VR, two-lens kit, or an ultrawide?
What gear should I rent or bring for my first event shoot with Nikon DX bodies?
Is the Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 a worthwhile upgrade from an 18-55mm kit lens?
Which budget telephoto lens is the best fit for a Nikon D5100: Nikon 70-300 VR, Nikon 55-300 VR, or Tamron 70-300?
What focal lengths are best for Banff landscapes on a Nikon D3300?