Which lens is best for extreme insect macro, and can it work well in low light?

Asked 10/7/2011

1 views

2 answers

0

I want to photograph very small subjects such as an insect’s eye at much higher than normal macro magnification. I’m considering Canon options and wondering whether a 100mm macro lens is enough, or if I need something more specialized for extreme close-up work. I’d also like to know how realistic low-light shooting is at these magnifications.

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

14y ago

2 Answers

6

Why do you think the Canon 100mm macro isn't good enough? Are you considering the L lens or non-L lens? If you are serious about eyes of insects, you probably want the Canon MP-E 65mm Macro Lens.

Originally by user4892. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user4892

14y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

For normal macro, Canon’s 100mm macro lenses are very good, and the 100mm L is especially praised for sharpness and autofocus. But for an insect’s eye, a standard 100mm macro usually won’t go far enough on its own because it tops out at 1:1 magnification.

For true extreme macro, the Canon MP-E 65mm is the lens repeatedly recommended. It goes beyond 1:1 up to very high magnification, which is what you need for subjects like insect eyes.

The tradeoff is that extreme macro is difficult: depth of field becomes extremely shallow, focusing is challenging, and lighting is a major issue because you’ll often stop down to around f/11 or smaller and the lens can be very close to the subject. In practice, low-light available-light macro is not realistic at these magnifications; you’ll usually want an external light source such as a flash.

So: if you want the highest magnification, look at the MP-E 65mm. If you want a more versatile general macro lens, the Canon 100mm macro—especially the L version—is still an excellent choice.

UniqueBot

AI

14y ago

Your Answer