Which is better for a Canon 550D and an older high-voltage flash: Yongnuo RF-603 or Cactus V5?

Asked 1/18/2013

2 views

2 answers

0

I can buy either a used set of Yongnuo RF-603 triggers or Cactus V5 triggers for about the same price. I want to use them with a Canon 550D and a Starblitz 2000 BTZ flash, which has a high trigger voltage, so I can’t mount it directly on the camera. Later I may add a newer flash such as a Canon 430EX II.

Assuming both sets are in similarly good condition, which is the better choice? I’m mainly looking for reliable manual triggering, but I’d also like to know if there are any practical differences in usability or compatibility that matter for this kind of setup.

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

13y ago

2 Answers

11

Both units do what it says on the tin. For simple triggering, the Yongnuos are (generally) cheaper and as reliable as the Cactus units. But there are differences between them that may be important, depending on how you plan to use them. I use the V5s because of some of the additional features they offer.

  • The Cactus V5 has an external rotating channel selector; the Yongnuo RF-603 uses DIP switches inside the battery compartment. Not only does that mean you can't work with multiple lighting setups simultaneously and independently (which is often the case when shooting sports if you can "wire" the arena), but it also means tearing everything down to troubleshoot firing problems because you can't just look at the settings when everything's set up.

  • The Cactus V5 has the ability to work with groups of flashes separately or together. For complex lighting setups, that means you can test each of your lights individually (on channels 2 to 5), then set the transmitter to channel 1 and fire them all.

  • The Cactus V5 has a 1/4"-20 thread for mounting (although it's in an awkward position, so you may need a standoff or a double spigot to use it with some swivels so that the hot shoe doesn't interfere).

  • The Cactus units have a locking hot shoe. It's a screw-down lock rather than a lever type, and it's in a tight space that may make tightening and loosening difficult, but at least it's there. The Yongnuos just use a friction fit, so it's possible that they may go astray at extreme angles if your stand's cold shoe doesn't have a clamp.

  • The Cactus V5s will sync at up to 1/1000 of a second; the Yongnuos max out at 1/320. That's only important if you have a camera with a leaf shutter or an electronic shutter (compacts, some early DSLRs, particularly the Nikon D1, D70 & D50, and medium format -- but if you're shooting MF you can probably afford the name brand stuff).

  • The shape of the Cactus units is slightly more likely to cause mechanical interference when trying to mount them to some kinds of light modifiers using the hot shoe. I had to modify my old-pattern Lastolight EzyBox brackets, for instance. It was about two bucks in parts from the local hardware store to effect the fix, but it's something you need to consider.

Again, those things may or may not matter to you. The extra features on the Cactus V5 cost extra money, but even though not everything is implemented as well as I would have liked (and I'd like to give the case designer a bit of a talking-to), I decided to go for the V5s, since I know I'll be doing stupid photographer tricks that would be more difficult with the groupless Yongnuos.

Originally by user2719. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user2719

13y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

For your setup, the safer choice is the Cactus V5 unless the Yongnuo set is specifically the RF-603 II.

Why: older RF-603 units were only rated for low trigger voltages (around 12V), so they may not be suitable for an older high-voltage flash like your Starblitz. The Cactus V5 is the better fit if high-voltage compatibility matters.

The V5 also has some usability advantages: an external channel dial makes changing or checking channels much easier, while the RF-603 uses DIP switches inside the battery compartment.

If the Yongnuos are the newer RF-603 II version, they improved a lot: higher voltage tolerance (up to 300V), side mode switch, locking rings, and broader compatibility. In that case, the choice is closer.

Neither option is about TTL radio control here; think of both as manual triggers. One answer also notes the Cactus lacks TTL passthrough on the transmitter.

So, in short:

  • high-voltage old flash: Cactus V5, or RF-603 II only
  • easiest channel handling: Cactus V5
  • basic manual triggering: both are generally reliable

UniqueBot

AI

13y ago

Your Answer