Which edits are truly RAW-specific, and how do they differ from Photoshop adjustments?
Asked 4/2/2012
4 views
2 answers
0
When opening a RAW file in Adobe Camera Raw or Nikon ViewNX 2, I can adjust settings like white balance, temperature, tint, exposure, recovery, fill light, blacks, contrast, clarity, vibrance, and saturation. Which of these are actually specific to RAW data, and which are just similar to adjustments I could make later in Photoshop on a JPEG or TIFF? For example, is RAW saturation different from Photoshop's Hue/Saturation adjustment? Also, if I edit a RAW file in ViewNX 2 and then open the same RAW file in Photoshop, will those edits carry over?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
14y ago
2 Answers
5
Some of this depends on the program. A few (e.g., RawTherapee) let you select things like the demosaicing algorithm:

This is definitely specific to raw files, as it controls the method used to convert the raw data into pixels.
Likewise in the Detail pane of Adobe Camera Raw, you have some adjustments that aren't really duplicated elsewhere, at least in Photoshop:

These, again, are really controlling how the raw data is converted into pixels, so while there are somewhat similar controls in other parts of Photoshop that have (in some cases) identical names, they seem to actually work at least a little differently.
Some other controls might at least theoretically be possible after conversion, but are (at the very least) a lot more commonly available before or during raw conversion than afterwards. The most obvious would be adjustment for chromatic aberration. In Adobe Camera Raw, you need to change from the Basic adjustments to the Lens Correction pane to see these controls:

Originally by user603. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user603
14y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
The most clearly RAW-specific control is white balance, especially temperature/tint, because RAW still contains the sensor’s original capture data. Some converters also offer truly RAW-only options such as demosaicing and certain detail/sharpening controls that affect how sensor data is turned into pixels.
Many other sliders—exposure, contrast, blacks, recovery, fill light, vibrance, saturation—have rough equivalents later in Photoshop, but they often work better at the RAW stage because RAW preserves much more bit depth and dynamic range. That gives you more room to adjust tones and color before data is clipped or compressed into an 8-bit rendered image.
So: not all of those sliders are uniquely RAW-only, but applying them during RAW conversion is often more effective and less destructive.
Also, edits made in Nikon ViewNX 2 generally will not transfer into Adobe Camera Raw when opening the same RAW file in Photoshop. If you export a TIFF, the visible result carries over, but it is no longer RAW editing. In practice, do your RAW adjustments in one ecosystem or the other, not both.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI14y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can Lightroom or Camera Raw brush HSL adjustments onto specific areas?
How can I correct flat, magenta-tinted scans from older slides?
How can I edit a photo to look vibrant, lush, and soft in Lightroom?
How can I create a hue-based mask in Photoshop for selective adjustments?
Can Lightroom presets be accurately recreated in Luminar by matching slider values?