Which compact interchangeable-lens cameras offer manual video control?

Asked 6/19/2011

2 views

2 answers

0

I want one camera for both everyday stills and video documenting kinetic sculptures and light installations. Compact size is important, so I’m interested in mirrorless/CSC models, especially Micro Four Thirds because of the small bodies and adaptable lens mount.

I was considering the Panasonic G3, but it appears to lack meaningful manual video control. I’d like at least aperture control for shallow depth of field, and ideally video quality closer to the GH2, but in a body no larger than a G3. I’ve also looked at Olympus PEN cameras, though I’ve seen mixed opinions about their video quality.

Are there compact interchangeable-lens cameras that combine small size with good manual video controls? Also, if I used a manual-aperture adapted lens on a G3, could I rely on the camera’s automatic ISO and shutter for usable video exposure?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

15y ago

2 Answers

4

four thirds will limit the ability to get the "depth of field eye candy effect"

You don't need a small aperture necessarily but the smaller the sensor the harder this is to achieve, the Sony uses an APS-C sensor which will help somewhat in doing what you want. I don't believe the manual control is up to par with your needs however.

Depth of field can be manufactured in post processing if it is a top priority of yours, this would give you more flexibility with camera choices as you can fiddle with it later on and get the image nice and sharp initially.

The Olympus also has some magnificent controls in regards to manual control, I think Andrew has a good point there. I can't say that the times I've used the PEN that the videos have been bad for a four thirds camera.

You can mount pretty much any lens to any camera these days it needs to have both manual aperture and focus rings however. I would really try to avoid any camera that does "auto ISO" or "auto aperture" as the only way to achieve great results is to control all these functions yourself. In decent light that means keeping ISO as low as you can and using your aperture to control the light and depth of field.

In the end the GH2 may not seem like a compact, but as soon as you put big lenses on these cameras, how can any of them be called compact? The only time I find the sony NEX even slightly compact is when it has the 17mm pancake lens on, then you lose your ability for decent depth of field (unless something is at minimum focus distance), any other lens, even primes make them so big that you may as well just get a better camera that is going to perform much better under your needs.

If you want professional results, unfortunately you are going to have to spend more on a camera to get them. In the end I would just get a decent proper DSLR and do things properly the first time.

The Nikon D3100 is one of the first DSLRs out with full time autofocus in Video and the results you will get, along with the lens options at your fingertips without mount adaptors and having to resort to manual lenses is far superior.

Originally by user6051. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user6051

15y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

For your priorities, the main tradeoff is size vs. video control vs. shallow depth of field. Micro Four Thirds bodies are compact, but the smaller sensor makes the “shallow DOF” look harder to achieve than with APS-C. If that look matters a lot, an APS-C mirrorless option may help more.

Among Micro Four Thirds, Olympus PEN models were noted as offering good manual controls, and their video quality isn’t necessarily poor for the format. The G3’s lack of proper manual video control is a real limitation if exposure control matters to you.

Using an adapted lens with a manual aperture ring on the G3 may give you aperture control, but you’d still be depending on the camera’s automatic shutter/ISO behavior, which is less predictable for video and may not give consistent results.

So: if compactness is the top priority, an Olympus PEN is a reasonable option to investigate. If shallow depth of field is more important, consider a compact APS-C mirrorless camera instead of Micro Four Thirds.

UniqueBot

AI

15y ago

Your Answer