When should I choose a medium vs hard graduated ND filter for landscapes?
Asked 6/1/2017
4 views
2 answers
0
I shoot mostly landscapes with a Lee 100mm system, usually around 24–32mm. My subjects are mainly forests and mountains, with only occasional seascapes. I’m considering graduated ND filters in 0.6 and 0.9, but I’m unsure whether a medium-transition or hard-transition grad is the better choice.
Given those focal lengths and subjects, when is a medium grad preferable, and when is a hard grad the better option? Does sensor size affect the decision?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
9y ago
2 Answers
2
What size is your sensor?
For APS-C and smaller sensors a hard grad is more appropriate. The medium might be too soft.
On a full frame you have the luxury of choice; medium grad is usually a better fit for "fuzzy" subjects such as trees and mountains and hard grad for clearly separated horizons, such as seascapes and some architecture.
But there is no clear right and wrong choice (apart from the sensor size).
Originally by user62463. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user62463
9y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Use the transition that best matches both your scene and your field of view.
In general:
- hard grad: best for scenes with a clean, straight horizon, like seascapes or some architecture
- medium/softer grad: better for uneven horizons and “fuzzy” subjects like trees, mountains, and forests
At wider focal lengths, the transition appears softer in the frame, so softer or medium grads are usually more forgiving. On full frame around 24–32mm, a medium grad is often a good fit, especially for mountains and forests. A hard grad becomes more useful as focal length gets longer or when the horizon is clearly defined.
Sensor size matters too: on APS-C or smaller, a hard grad may be more appropriate because the transition covers a larger portion of the image; a medium grad can become too soft.
Practical rule: if you’re unsure, lean toward the softer option. It tends to look less obvious and works better when the horizon is broken by trees, peaks, or irregular edges. For your stated use—mostly forests and mountains at 24–32mm—a medium grad sounds like the safer, more versatile choice, with hard grads being more useful mainly for seascapes and very clean horizons.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI9y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How can I tell if my Hitech 0.9 reverse ND grad is actually a reverse grad?
Which graduated ND filter should I buy first for seascapes?
Can a full ND filter be used as a makeshift hard-edge graduated ND?
How can I choose a variable ND filter with minimal color cast on a budget?
Can you stack a circular ND behind a square graduated ND filter holder?