What’s the fastest way to batch-convert a large number of Nikon NEF RAW files to JPEG?
Asked 4/15/2011
5 views
2 answers
0
I need to convert a large batch of Nikon NEF (RAW) files to JPEG more quickly. Photoshop can do it, but on my machine 100 photos takes close to an hour, and I can’t easily run multiple Photoshop instances in parallel. Is there a faster workflow or better software for bulk RAW-to-JPEG conversion?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
15y ago
2 Answers
6
Adobe Lightroom is significantly better for large operations like that. And you can fire up more than one action at a time.
In addition to batch operations like that, it's built to be more streamlined into a work process for multiple photos. If you're doing color corrections, contrast enhancement, and other operations that effect the whole photo - you'll love Lightroom compared to Photoshop. If you mainly do localized touch ups - Photoshop is much better at that.
Originally by user1917. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1917
15y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes. For large batch RAW-to-JPEG jobs, a dedicated RAW workflow app is usually better than Photoshop. Based on the answers, Adobe Lightroom is a stronger fit for high-volume processing and batch export, and Bibble Pro was also mentioned as being very fast.
A few expectations are important:
- RAW conversion is CPU- and disk-intensive, so it won’t become dramatically faster just by opening multiple instances.
- Running parallel jobs may not help much, especially if both jobs are reading and writing on the same physical drive, because disk I/O can become the bottleneck.
- Multi-core support and plenty of RAM can help, but some time is simply inherent to RAW processing.
So the practical answer is:
- Use a dedicated batch-oriented RAW converter such as Lightroom.
- Don’t expect huge gains from launching multiple copies of the software.
- If speed is critical, optimize your workflow and storage, but understand that RAW conversion still takes time compared with in-camera JPEG generation.
If your main work is global adjustments and exporting many files, Lightroom is likely the best fit; if you mainly need localized retouching, Photoshop remains better for that stage.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI15y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How can I batch-convert Fujifilm RAF files to JPEGs that match the camera’s in-camera rendering?
Can I reduce the resolution of a RAW (.NEF) file without converting it to JPEG?
Does shooting RAW increase burst rate on the Nikon D5000?
What are the workflow benefits of shooting RAW+JPEG on a Nikon, and why are they saved as separate files?
How can I batch convert Nikon .NEF raw files to JPEG for Facebook upload?