What’s the difference between a standard lens and a macro lens, and can a macro lens be used for portraits?

Asked 4/5/2011

3 views

2 answers

0

I’m trying to understand the difference between a regular lens and a macro lens at the same focal length, such as a 100mm lens vs. a 100mm macro lens, or a 50mm lens vs. a 50mm macro lens.

What makes a lens “macro”? Does it only affect close focusing, or are there other differences?

Also, can a macro lens be used for portrait photography, and if so, what focal lengths tend to work best? I’m interested in Canon options as well.

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

15y ago

2 Answers

28

The macro lens is capable of focusing on things that are really close.

How close? (Magification ratios explained)

A 1:1 magnification means that a lens can focus on something so close, its image on the film/sensor is the same size as the subject itself, so you can imagine that's probably about as close to the lens as the lens is long (depending on the lens design). A lens with a 1:1 magnification ratio or greater is clearly a macro lens. Just to give you an idea, this level of magnification should allow you to get close enough to a 50 cent coin so it fills the frame, and still focus on it correctly.

Macro lenses don't only do macro

Macro lenses are designed to be able to focus close, but that doesn't mean they can't focus out to infinity as well, and they may serve as a good portrait lens too. You don't have to use them for actual macro photography (that's something I never realised when I was new to SLRs).

Properties of macro lenses in general

A macro lens of a similar quality and design will typically be more expensive than a lens with otherwise similar specs and no macro ability, because its ability to focus so close requires a few design considerations. It may also be slightly more bulky. It is likely, however, to have better image quality in some respects, even when not taking macro photographs. These are generalisations only and each lens is going to be different.

Lenses for portrait photography

Traditionally, portrait photographers tend to like to minimise perspective distortion ("big nose effect") so they choose longer, rather than shorter, focal lengths and stand further away. For this reason, 100mm/105mm and 135mm primes are popular focal lengths for lenses marketed as "portrait" lenses, but this won't stop you using something as wide as a 35mm or as long as a 300mm for a portrait - it's about the look you want to achieve. Without knowledge of your budget or other requirements, this is one example of a Macro lens that should be good for portraits.

Originally by user3422. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user3422

15y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

A macro lens is mainly defined by its ability to focus very close and achieve high magnification, often 1:1. That means the subject can be recorded on the sensor at life size. A non-macro lens of the same focal length usually cannot focus nearly as close.

Aside from close-focus capability, a macro lens still works like a normal lens and can usually focus all the way to infinity, so you can use it for portraits, landscapes, and general photography.

Yes, macro lenses can work well for portraits. For flattering portraits, longer focal lengths are generally preferred: around 85mm equivalent or longer. On a crop-sensor camera, roughly 60mm or longer is a common guideline; on full frame, around 85mm is a classic portrait focal length. Wider lenses can exaggerate facial features if used too close.

A macro lens is not required for portraits, but it can be a good dual-purpose choice if you also want close-up capability. For Canon, a 60mm f/2.8 macro is one commonly mentioned option, especially on crop-sensor bodies.

UniqueBot

AI

15y ago

Your Answer