What’s the difference between a Singh-Ray Vari-ND and cheaper variable ND filters?

Asked 11/1/2010

10 views

2 answers

0

I’m considering a Singh-Ray Vari-ND variable neutral density filter, but it’s much more expensive than low-cost variable ND filters sold online. Are the cheaper ones worth buying, or does the Singh-Ray justify the premium? What practical differences should I expect in image quality and build quality between a high-end variable ND and a cheap knock-off?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

15y ago

2 Answers

9

The mechanism is likely a combination of a linear polarizer and a circular polarizer (which itself is a linear polarizer followed by a quarter wave plate). Thus the differences you can expect between high-quality and cheaper variable ND filters ought to be similar to the differences found among polarizers which include flare, vignetting, inhomogeneity, and color shifts. You can avoid flare in many cases by not including bright lights in the photo; vignetting can be compensated in software and sometimes is desirable; I suspect the inhomogeneities are usually not noticeable; but color shifts can be pronounced. Typically a set of crossed polarizers (which is what you're using to get the heaviest ND settings) pass essentially no colors except violet. Therefore, I would expect cheaper variable ND filters to work OK except at the heaviest settings (more than about 4 stops) where the violet shift will become pronounced.

You can see evidence of vignetting and a violet shift on this dealer's website. Compare the bottom two photos: the one taken with their ND filter has pronounced vignetting (many stops) and a strong blue cast. In contrast, look at the photos on the Singh-Ray site. If you look closely you can see the vignetting, but there's little evidence of a violet shift: look at the grays of the rocks in the stream. Maybe those were post-processed to remove the blue, so the comparison is not definitive, but these two sites nicely illustrate the difference we would expect between good and bad variable ND filters.

I did a quick test using a high-end, top-rated Marumi circular polarizing filter and an old low-end Vivitar linear filter. In combination they made a fine variable ND filter, although there were some color shifts (first to yellow, surprisingly), but below about 3-4 stops a yellow incandescent light started to take a distinctly blue hue. At the maximum density, probably around 6 - 8 stops (I only looked, I didn't measure), only the light was visible and it was a brilliant blue, the color of a Wratten 80b filter.

Your best bet for a cheap solution, then, is actually to look through one of the inexpensive filters and pay special attention to the apparent color at the densest ND settings. While you're at it, look at a bright light through the filter to check for flare and scattering. If everything's acceptable you probably have a great deal.

Originally by user1356. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1356

15y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Variable ND filters generally work by combining polarizing elements, so the differences between expensive and cheap versions are similar to the differences between high- and low-quality polarizers. The main issues reported with cheaper filters are stronger color casts, flare, vignetting, uneven density, and weaker build quality. Some users also find that inexpensive filters can have loose glass or come apart over time.

Even good variable NDs may show some color shift, especially at stronger settings, but cheaper ones tend to show it more noticeably. That color cast is often the biggest practical difference in results. Build quality is another reason people pay more for premium filters.

The Singh-Ray’s appeal is not only image quality but also usability: you can quickly dial it lighter for focusing/composing and then darken it for the exposure.

If image quality is critical, the premium option is more likely to give cleaner results and better construction. If budget matters most, a cheap variable ND may still be usable, but expect more compromises. Several photographers would also consider a fixed ND filter instead, since it can offer more neutral color and better value if you don’t need variable adjustment.

UniqueBot

AI

15y ago

Your Answer