What’s the best workflow for organizing and finding photos: folders, keywords, or a Lightroom catalog?
Asked 11/13/2015
6 views
2 answers
0
I currently keep one folder per shoot named with the date and a short description, but it’s becoming hard to manage and search. I want a better workflow for importing, organizing, editing, and finding images later by things like model, subject, year, or whether the images are personal, stock, or client work.
Should I focus on building a detailed folder structure, or is it better to rely on Lightroom or similar cataloging software with metadata and keywords? Is it worth spending time keywording and cataloging each shoot, and how does that improve searching compared with folders alone?
I’m looking for beginner-friendly guidance on a practical workflow that covers import, basic organization, editing steps, and long-term searchability.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
10y ago
2 Answers
10
i have to bring some order in my folder structure
No, you don't. You are trying to solve the very problem that cataloging software like Lightroom addresses.
Existing Metadata
As technology evolves, folder structure will have less emphasis, but even today I would argue it is a waste of your time. The existing gold mine is image metadata, in the form of EXIF/IPTC tags and attributes. In the future desktop users will likely be treated with even more machine learning benefits that rely less on EXIF but instead combine with them for even better results.
Keywords
Beyond what is done for you, image keywords in today's world are quite critical to the successful cataloging of many images. Keywords can be added in a variety of different ways and at really any step in the process that you desire. More information on Keywords can be found here: Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Help / Use keywords
Example
You can spend all day creating a folder that you may think best describes the images contained within. "2015-11-13 - Fun Fall day at the park". This sounds descriptive and useful. It tells you the date, season, location, and experience. But what if tomorrow you want to look for images that were shot with your favorite 35mm lens, at the widest aperture of f/1.4, during the golden hour, were rated at 5 stars, and had your best friend Bob in them? The folder name did quite literally nothing to help you find that image. Does it matter that the image was on D:\Photos\2015\11\13\2015-11-13 - Fun Fall day at the Park"? No it doesn't. In fact, it doesn't matter with Lightroom if the image is even stored locally, it could be on a disconnected drive and the Lightroom catalog will still reference it.
Lightroom Features
As far as searching specifically, Lightroom has vast options such as:
- Library filter bar (Text/Attribute/Metadata Filter)
- Collections / Smart Collections
- Keywords
- People view mode
Originally by user4892. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user4892
10y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
A detailed folder tree usually isn’t the best long-term solution. Cataloging software such as Lightroom is designed to solve this problem more effectively by using metadata rather than forcing you to encode everything into folders.
A simple folder structure is enough, for example one folder per shoot or date. Then use the catalog for the real organization:
- rely on existing metadata like EXIF/IPTC
- add keywords for model, subject, location, project type, etc.
- use the catalog to search, filter, and group images later
Yes, keywording is generally worth the effort, especially if you need to find images by multiple criteria. Folders can usually only represent one hierarchy at a time, while keywords and metadata let the same photo be found by year, person, subject, or usage type without duplication.
A practical workflow is:
- import photos into a simple dated/shoot folder
- add metadata and keywords
- do base edits in Lightroom
- send selected files to Photoshop only when needed for deeper editing
- use the catalog for search and retrieval
In short: keep folders simple, and invest your effort in metadata, keywords, and cataloging.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI10y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What is a good photography workflow for organizing, editing, and managing photos?
How can I reorganize a large Lightroom photo library into folders without losing edits?
Cross-platform multi-user photo management software for a central server
Is Capture One or Media Pro a good Lightroom replacement for both RAW editing and photo organization?
How can I export all Lightroom folders while keeping the folder hierarchy and edits?