What’s the best way to host images so links stay stable for blogs, clients, and submissions?
Asked 5/3/2016
3 views
2 answers
0
I’ve used Flickr to host images that were embedded on my blog, but links later broke after Flickr changed something. I already handle backups separately; my main concern is reliable image hosting for sharing and embedding.
I’d like a centralized place where I can host images and keep stable links for things like blog posts, portfolio samples, competition or residency submissions, client access, or third-party articles that need to display my work while I retain control.
Is using my own hosting/domain the best approach for this, or are third-party services reliable enough for long-term links?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
10y ago
2 Answers
1
It might not have been a technical glitch with Flickr. They might just have changed their site structure - you can't rely on a free third party service to guarantee a 'permalink' type structure in their site.
Your question doesn't seem to relate to backups as such, I presume you've got some sort of backup system in place already, and that you are exclusively asking about an easy way to share images.
The best way to be sure that a link you use isn't going to break is to purchase your own hosting. This is the only way you can really guarantee anything (excepting the fact that you are dependent on your hosting service not having issues). Paid hosting with your own domain is relatively cheap. You can use various off-the-shelf and open source gallery type sites, Wordpress, Joomla or any other content management system. Obviously the trade-off is that it's up to you to configure it and maintain it. If you're prepared to spend a bit of time though, a simple self-hosted Wordpress site may be worth creating.
This isn't a free solution, but it doesn't have to be expensive, but at the end of the day, you need to have some sort of solution that you have control over.
Originally by user24522. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user24522
10y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
If stable, long-term links matter, your own hosting on your own domain is the safest approach.
Free third-party services can change policies, file URLs, site structure, or embedding rules at any time, so they’re not ideal if you need dependable links for blogs, client delivery, submissions, or published articles. Even if the service is reputable, you usually can’t guarantee a permanent URL structure.
Using paid hosting with your own domain gives you the most control over how images are stored and linked. It doesn’t eliminate all risk—you still depend on your web host staying online—but it greatly reduces the chance of links breaking because of someone else’s platform changes.
For sharing, you can use your own site with a gallery or CMS platform such as WordPress or Joomla, or another gallery system that lets you manage image URLs yourself. Keep backups separate from hosting: backup protects your files, while self-hosting helps preserve reliable public links.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI10y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
What’s the best way to upload photos from Lightroom 3 to Flickr?
How can I publish and view gigapixel panoramas on my own website?
What’s a good way to host a personal photo gallery for a website when web hosting storage is limited?
Are third-party DSLR batteries less reliable than official camera batteries?
How can I share photos for free use without allowing stock agencies to resell licenses?