What ultimately limits image quality on a hypothetical noise-free camera sensor?
Asked 10/16/2011
2 views
2 answers
0
If a camera sensor had perfect quantum efficiency and introduced no read/readout electrical noise, what would set the remaining image-quality limit? Is there any meaningful ISO-per-pixel-area threshold where shot noise makes images no longer useful, or does usefulness mainly depend on total collected light, sensor area, and final output size rather than pixel area alone?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
14y ago
2 Answers
8
Here's a good simulation of the 'perfect' sensor that you describe (one having zero electrical noise, thus recordning every incident photon perfectly) reacting to widely differing levels of light, from 0.001, 0.01 & 0.1 photons per pixel (top row), 1, 10 & 100 photons per pixel (middle row) to 1000, 10000 & 100000 photons per pixel across the bottom row.
Click for a larger version where you can make out individual pixels. Image by Mdf some rights reserved.
You can't specificy ISO sensitivity without knowing the saturation point of the sensor (without saturation there is no overexposure), so for your hypothetical 'perfect sensor' you'd have to chose an abitrary saturation point, making the ISO values computed for the images arbitrary too.
However to answer your question it appears about 1 photon per pixel is the limit of getting meaningful images (the top right image, with 1 photon every 10 pixels, looks unrecognisable to me).
Originally by user1375. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1375
14y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
There isn’t a single physical ISO-per-pixel-area limit where images suddenly stop being useful. In a hypothetical perfect sensor, the remaining limit is photon shot noise: light arrives randomly, and the noise grows roughly with the square root of the number of photons, so signal-to-noise improves as you collect more total photons.
Pixel area by itself is not the key limit. Smaller pixels look noisier per pixel, but if you downscale or compare images at the same output size, that noise averages out. What matters more is total light gathered by the whole sensor, plus exposure and scene brightness. Sensor saturation/full-well capacity would also matter if you want ISO to be defined meaningfully, because ISO depends on how signal maps to clipping and output brightness.
So the practical answer is: with zero electronic noise, image quality is still limited by shot noise, and “useful” becomes subjective. It depends on the scene, output size, viewing distance, and denoising. Extremely low photon counts can still produce recognizable images, but they become progressively grainier rather than hitting a hard cutoff.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI14y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Why do small-sensor cameras show more noise, and can future technology eliminate it?
Is image SNR determined per pixel or by total photons collected?
Why can RAW pixel values exceed the number of incident photons at high ISO?
What limits the frame rate and readout patterns of a CMOS image sensor?
What image-quality benefit does a 100MP medium-format sensor offer over a 60MP full-frame sensor with the same pixel pitch?