What tripod should I buy for a Canon 600D with a 70-300mm lens on a tight budget?
Asked 8/30/2012
3 views
2 answers
0
I’m looking for a first tripod for a Canon 600D, mainly for occasional nature photography. It needs to support the camera with a telephoto lens such as a Canon 70-300mm. I’d prefer something light and easy to carry and set up. My original budget was about £30, but I’m considering spending a bit more and have looked at the Manfrotto Compact series and the Slik Sprint Pro II. Are these sensible entry-level choices, and what should I expect at this price level?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
13y ago
2 Answers
5
I've got a tripod very similar to this one from Dolica. It's not without its faults. The ballhead doesn't move quite as nicely as I'd like, and I can count on just a bit of movement as I lock it in place. Once it's set, though, I'm happy with the results. Just as no lens is without its faults, no tripod is without vibration, and good technique helps improve your results, too. Keep the center column down if you can, extend the legs only as far as you need to, hang some weight on the center, use mirror lock-up and a remote shutter release -- all the normal stuff applies.
There's no doubt at all that higher-end tripods would perform even better, but I've lugged this one up and down any number of trails, set it up in streams, plopped it into snowbanks, stuck it in the mud, used it as a walking stick -- you name it. No worries. For less than $50, it's miles ahead of the tripods you'd find at Wal-Mart for $30 or $40.
I typically use this with a Canon 40D and a 15-85mm lens. I've used it with my 70-300 lens without incident, as well. This was my 50mm lens, set up on a bunch of jagged rocks for 30 seconds.
Originally by user269. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user269
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
At around £30, expectations need to be modest: most tripods in that range are usable, but not especially rigid or refined. They can work as a first tripod, but many photographers end up replacing them once they learn what stability really matters.
The key point is stability, especially with a 70-300mm lens. A tripod that won’t hold the camera steady for longer exposures defeats the purpose. In general, spending more gets you noticeably better stiffness and head performance.
Entry-level options like the Manfrotto Compact series or Slik Sprint Pro II are more sensible than very cheap no-name models, but they’re still compromises rather than “buy once” solutions.
Whichever tripod you choose, technique matters a lot:
- keep the center column down
- extend legs only as much as needed
- add weight to the center if possible
- use mirror lock-up/live view if available
- use a remote release or self-timer
If you truly won’t use a tripod often, an inexpensive one can be a reasonable learner purchase. But if you want solid long-exposure performance with a telephoto lens, it’s worth stretching the budget beyond the cheapest options.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Which budget telephoto lens is the best fit for a Nikon D5100: Nikon 70-300 VR, Nikon 55-300 VR, or Tamron 70-300?
Nikon AF-S 55-300mm VR vs Tamron SP 70-300mm VC USD for a D5100
What should I look for in a tabletop tripod for macro photography with a Canon 550D?
Good starter telephoto lens for Canon wildlife photography?
Is a non-VR Nikon 70-300mm a good budget bird lens for a Nikon D40?
