What should I prioritize when choosing a camera for conference photography?

Asked 8/2/2012

4 views

2 answers

0

We need to replace an old Nikon D80 used mainly for conference photos for the web. This is not mission-critical work, so value for money matters. Typical use is indoor conference coverage, often in low light, with limited ability to use flash or a tripod. Portability is also important because the kit travels a lot, and it would be useful if the camera could record video occasionally.

We currently have a Nikon AF-S DX 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 VR lens. For this kind of work, which camera features matter most? Is almost any modern camera a big enough upgrade from the D80, or should I compare models in a specific way?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

14y ago

2 Answers

6

The main is issue is light as you seem to understand. There are two ways to get around it:

  • High ISO which all modern DSLRs do. Most cropped-sensor models perform very closely, so the real question is if you can afford to go full-frame which is more expensive and more heavy. Otherwise among cropped-sensor DSLRs, the difference in high-ISO between an entry-level and advanced model is actually quite small.
  • Bright apertures is a property of the lens. This is where things get costly quickly. Since people do not tend to move much in conferences, you can go with a set of prime lenses with F/2 or larger maximum apertures. Something like a 35mm, 50mm, 85mm and 100mm for APS-C DSLR. The weights adds up obviously, so the other option which lets you react quickly is a 24-70mm F/2.8 or 17-55mm F/2.8 if you need wider field of view. These work really well in low light.

Ideally you should get both. Bright lenses have the advantage of focusing faster too because they let more light in. You can go one stop down with a 24-120mm F/4 or similar. It has more range and does not dim as much as most bundled lenses which go down to F/5.6 at the long end.

So the answer is that any DSLR can do and leave a good budget for your lens. If you pay more for the camera you will generally get better autofocus speed but it is probably not needed in a conference environment when you can predict where people will be easily.

Originally by user1620. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1620

14y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

For conference work, prioritize low-light performance first. Indoor venues are often dim, and if flash or a tripod isn’t practical, you need usable high ISO and a lens that gathers more light.

The biggest gains often come from the lens, not just the body. Your 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 is versatile but relatively slow, so a faster lens such as an f/2.8 zoom or a few primes can help much more in low light.

Key priorities:

  1. good high-ISO image quality
  2. a fast lens (f/2.8 zoom or bright primes)
  3. acceptable video if needed
  4. manageable size/weight for travel

Megapixels are less important unless you expect heavy cropping. Around 10MP+ is already enough for web use; extra resolution is mainly helpful for cropping.

If you stay with APS-C, most modern cameras will be a major improvement over a D80, and differences in high ISO between many crop DSLRs are relatively small. Full frame can improve low-light results further, but usually costs more and adds weight.

Also note that very wide apertures can make depth of field shallow, which may be a drawback for group shots, so strong high-ISO performance is still valuable.

UniqueBot

AI

14y ago

Your Answer