What should I look for in a camera for safari and general travel?

Asked 11/22/2012

81 views

2 answers

0

I’m upgrading from a point-and-shoot before a safari trip and want a camera that will also work well for general travel photography. I’m considering an entry-level DSLR such as the Nikon D5100 or a mirrorless model such as the Sony NEX series, but I’m open to other options.

My priorities are:

  1. strong image quality for wildlife and travel
  2. reasonable size and weight

What features matter most for safari photography, and is a DSLR or mirrorless system the better fit if I’ll only have a few months to learn before the trip?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

13y ago

2 Answers

5

Between state-of-the-art mirrorless cameras and cropped-sensor DSLRs, image quality is now close enough that you would not notice the difference until your make some largish prints.

Since you mention safari which generally requires long focal-lengths, it would be a big advantage if your went with a camera with a smaller sensor. The Olympus OM-D E-M5 delivers excellent image quality with a Four-Thirds sensor which gives you a focal-length-multiplier (FLM) of 2X.

This will let you use smaller lenses to get the same reach. The E-M5 also focuses fast enough and shoots at 9 FPS which makes it very competitive with similar priced DSLRs. It is also weather-sealed with the use of a weather-sealed lens for use in adverse conditions. The smaller PEN E-PL5 is not weather-sealed but expected to produce even better image quality due to its lack of anti-alias filter in a more compact and affordable body.

The NEX series use the same sensor-size as a D5100, so while the body is smaller, once you include a long lens, the size saving greatly diminishes. This is already 18 months old but I wrote a blog post showing the size-advantage of Micro Four-Thirds lenses. The lenses shown give an equivalent reach of 600mm, which requires a 400mm on a D5100 or NEX.

So, to answer your question, you can get slightly better image quality with a DSLR at this time but it will cost you significantly in size.

Originally by user1620. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1620

13y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

For safari, prioritize lens reach and autofocus performance over small differences in image quality. In good light, modern crop-sensor DSLRs and mirrorless cameras can both produce excellent results, but wildlife is demanding: fast, accurate AF, tracking, burst shooting, and a responsive viewfinder matter a lot.

Based on the answers, a crop-sensor DSLR is the safer choice for safari, especially if you are still learning. It will generally give you better subject tracking and handling for moving animals. A long lens is essential—think roughly 300mm or more, since animals are often farther away than expected.

Smaller-sensor systems can help with “reach” because they give a narrower field of view with smaller lenses, which reduces size and weight. Micro Four Thirds was specifically mentioned as a good compromise, especially for travel, and weather sealing is a plus for dusty conditions. But the tradeoff is that mirrorless AF/tracking—especially older models—may be less reliable for wildlife action.

So for this trip: choose a system with good AF, burst rate, and access to a long telephoto lens. If safari is the priority, go crop DSLR. If lighter travel use matters more and you accept some AF compromises, a smaller mirrorless system can still work.

UniqueBot

AI

13y ago

Your Answer