What makes a good walkaround zoom lens, and are superzooms worth it?

Asked 7/15/2010

2 views

2 answers

0

I’m looking for a general-purpose walkaround lens, ideally for Canon, that covers a useful range from fairly wide to short telephoto. I’ve used an older Sigma 18-125mm and like the flexibility, but I’m hoping for better image quality, stabilization, and faster/quieter autofocus. I’ve also heard mixed things about longer superzooms like 18-200mm or 18-250mm, especially about overall image quality. Are there good all-in-one options, and what trade-offs should I expect versus a shorter, higher-quality zoom or even a prime?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

16y ago

2 Answers

14

I guess it depends on what your cost range is, what camera you use, and what your goals are. I myself am a canon user, so I can give you options that would serve a canon camera particularly well. I can't say that I can help much for other brands.

If you need a cheaper, middle-grade, middle-range lens that will cover most common situations, a lens in the range of 20-130mm will probably suffice. Canon makes two lenses in this range, of different grades: the EF 24-105mm f/4 IS USM L, and the EF 28-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS USM.

The 24-105 lens is a higher end L-series pro lens. Its an excellent quality lens and a good performer. It has an f/4 aperture, which while ok for general lighting, will not perform as well in more fringe lighting scenarios like indoor sports, morning/evening, or night shooting. The 28-135 lens is very similar, but is one of Canon's middle-grade lines. Its quality is not quite as good as an L-series. It does offer a slightly larger aperture at f/3.5, but it is not constant, and closes down to f/5.6 as you zoom. It does offer slightly greater zoom range, however, which may be useful.

If you are looking for a single lens that is truly multi-purpose, and will cover any situation you may find yourself in, then there is also a large zoom range lens for that as well. The EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM L lens is one of the ultimate multi-purpose lenses I've ever encountered. It has one of the largest zoom ranges in existence at 11x zoom. This lens, at the short end of 28mm, is not particularly wide with an f/3.5 aperture. However, as it extends towars the 300mm long end, an f/5.6 aperture is not too bad. The quality of this lens is pretty good throughout its range, although it certainly is not as good as a 300mm or 28mm prime. Given that it is a single lens, it is highly adaptable for a broad range of situations, allowing you to take one lens and leave the rest at home.

Canon lenses usually come with a price premium, and there are some other brands that offer similar lenses at similar quality, and cheaper cost. You might also look into the following:

Originally by user124. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user124

16y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

There isn’t really a perfect do-everything walkaround lens without trade-offs. In general, the bigger the zoom range, the more likely you are to give up some image quality, speed, or both.

From the answers, the safer high-quality Canon-style option is a mid-range zoom like a 24-105mm f/4 IS USM or 28-135mm IS USM: useful range, stabilization, and quieter/faster autofocus, with better overall performance than many superzooms. The downside is less reach than an 18-200mm-type lens.

Superzooms can be good, but quality varies a lot by model. One answer notes a Nikon 18-200 works well, while an 18-250-type lens performed poorly. So yes, a good superzoom is possible, but it usually costs more and still involves compromise.

If low light and compactness matter more than zoom flexibility, a small prime like a 50mm f/1.8 can also make an excellent walkaround lens.

So the choice is:

  • best quality and AF/IS: moderate-range zoom
  • maximum convenience: a well-reviewed superzoom
  • best low-light/lightweight option: fast prime

UniqueBot

AI

16y ago

Your Answer