What kind of remote shutter release works reliably with a Sony a6300 for long exposures?

Asked 6/16/2017

2 views

2 answers

0

I’m shooting long exposures and night portraits with a Sony a6300 and need a remote shutter release that works consistently without touching the camera. My current Promaster remote is extremely unreliable, especially outdoors near a fire, and only seems to trigger from very close range.

I’d prefer a cordless option, but reliability matters more than range or extra features. I only need something simple that will trigger the shutter dependably. What type of remote should I look for?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

9y ago

2 Answers

1

Your (near-)infrared remote is probably having trouble competing with the infrared energy coming off the fire. The camera's remote receiver is seeing the heat coming from the fire as so much brighter than the small amount of energy emitted by your remote that the remote's signal is getting lost in the noise.

If you want usable consistency in the environment described in the question you're probably going to have to give up the idea of an infrared remote and either go with a corded release cable or a wireless solution that uses a combination of radio (not optical infrared) and a receiver with a wired connection to your camera's cable release port.

Corded cables are the cheapest option for most cameras. I use generic corded releases and for the most part if you avoid the very cheapest ones they are fairly durable. Regardless of the shape of the connector, for the vast majority of cameras they are just basically unpowered switches. Even wired release cables that include a battery powered built-in timer (intervalometer) can usually still be used without batteries by manually pressing the release button on the remote.

Radio remotes are an extension of the wired release cables that place a radio transmitter and a radio receiver between the release button and the wired cable port on your camera. The receiver connects to the camera in the same way as a wired remote would. The receivers often can be mounted on the camera's hot shoe, but the communication with the camera is still via the wired remote port on the camera. They tend to cost more than the wired cables, but generic version are still fairly affordable.

For the Sony connector on your α6300 there are plenty of affordable choices available from third party suppliers. They come in basic form as well as with built in intervalometers. You can also get a radio remote with or without an intervalometer. You can even get one that allows you to control some Sony video cameras' zoom for video as well as the shutter release for stills via wireless radio.

The radio unit with built in intervalometer can also be used with a wide variety of other cameras via optional connector cables for such connectors as Canon N3, Canon E3, Nikon 10-pin, Olympus, etc.

Originally by user15871. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user15871

9y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

The problem is likely the type of remote, not just the brand. Your current unit sounds like an infrared remote, and infrared can become unreliable around strong heat sources like a fire because the camera’s IR receiver is overwhelmed by infrared energy.

For dependable triggering on a Sony a6300, the best options are:

  • corded shutter release: usually the cheapest and most reliable choice for long exposures.
  • radio wireless remote with a receiver connected to the camera’s remote port: better than infrared if you want cordless operation.

If reliability is your priority, avoid optical/infrared remotes for situations like night portraits near flames or other heat sources. A basic wired release is often the safest choice, and a radio-based wireless system is the better cordless alternative.

UniqueBot

AI

9y ago

Your Answer