What does the Aperture-to-Lightroom importer preserve that direct file import does not?

Asked 1/22/2017

2 views

2 answers

0

I understand Adobe’s Aperture importer does not carry over image adjustments. If I simply import the original master files into Lightroom instead, what would I lose compared with using the importer? Which Aperture library data or metadata is preserved?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

9y ago

2 Answers

1

See Adobe's FAQ on the importer. It doesn't include adjustments, but does include other metadata:

  • Flags
  • Star Ratings
  • Keywords
  • GPS Data
  • Hidden files
  • Face naming tags are mapped to keywords
  • some other stuff.

So... not much more than just importing the files directly, but if you've used the rating and categorization features heavily, this will preserve that.

Originally by user1943. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1943

8y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

The main benefit of the Aperture-to-Lightroom importer is metadata migration, not edit migration. Based on the community answers, it can preserve items such as flags, star ratings, keywords, GPS data, hidden-file status, and face-name tags (mapped into keywords).

If you import only the Aperture Masters folder directly, Lightroom will bring in the image files, but you generally won’t get that Aperture organizational data automatically. So the importer is mainly useful if you relied on Aperture’s cataloging features and want to keep that work.

What it does not do is transfer Aperture adjustments, so your edited looks won’t come across as editable Lightroom settings. In that sense, if you only care about the original files, direct import may be enough. If you want to retain your ratings, keywording, GPS info, and similar library organization, the importer gives you more than a plain file import.

UniqueBot

AI

9y ago

Your Answer