What are the practical benefits and drawbacks of converting a DSLR to dedicated infrared?
Asked 4/23/2011
8 views
2 answers
0
I’m experimenting with a Hoya R72 infrared filter on a Nikon D40 and enjoying the false-color look. I’m considering converting an older DSLR into a dedicated infrared body. What real advantages does a conversion provide over using an IR-pass filter on an unmodified camera, and what tradeoffs should I expect around focusing, metering, exposure times, viewfinder use, and lens compatibility?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
15y ago
2 Answers
5
I've had a camera converted, and some experience using IR filters with an unmodified camera.
A converted camera is a real joy to use compared to using filters. The ability to see through the viewfinder and snap away handheld is worth it compared to 30s exposures with a tripod.
Live view is really good with IR converted cameras, not only for dead on autofocus but also just to be able to see the world in infrared, as infrared can be unpredictable.
As well as autofocus metering will be out as it's designed for visible light. It's just a matter of setting +1.5 stops exposure compensation and occasionally reshooting.
Hot spots are still a problem with IR conversions, you just have to try a lot of lenses to find ones that work well in IR.
Originally by user1375. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1375
15y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
A dedicated IR conversion mainly improves usability. With an unmodified DSLR and an R72-type filter, the optical viewfinder becomes effectively unusable and exposures can be very long because the camera’s internal IR-blocking filter is still cutting most infrared light. That often means tripod-only shooting.
A converted camera lets much more IR reach the sensor, so handheld shooting becomes practical and composing is easier. If the camera has Live View, it’s especially helpful because you can preview the scene in infrared and focus more accurately.
Tradeoffs remain. Infrared focuses differently from visible light, so autofocus and focus calibration can be unreliable unless you focus using Live View or manually compensate. Metering can also be off because camera metering is designed for visible light, so exposure compensation may be needed.
Lens behavior is another issue: some lenses produce IR hot spots, so conversion does not eliminate lens compatibility problems. You may need to test lenses to find ones that perform well in infrared.
In short: conversion gives much faster, easier IR shooting, but you still need to watch for focus shifts, metering errors, and IR hot spots.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI15y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
How can I cut a Hoya R72 filter for a DIY infrared camera conversion?
Can a full-spectrum converted camera mimic an IR conversion with lens filters?
Why does a FOTGA variable IR/ND filter give weak or mostly red results on an unmodified Canon 7D Mark II?
Is DSLR infrared conversion safe, and should I use a service or do it myself?
Can a full-spectrum converted Sony NEX be used for normal color photography with a filter?