What are the advantages of separate bleach and fixer in C-41 versus a blix kit?
Asked 10/12/2020
15 views
2 answers
0
For home C-41 processing, many kits combine bleach and fixer into a single blix step, while lab-style processes use separate bleach and fixer baths. What practical advantages do separate bleach and fixer offer over blix? Does it improve chemistry life, flexibility, or final negative quality enough to produce a noticeable difference in the negatives?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
5y ago
2 Answers
4
The C-41 and E-6 processes and their cine counterparts evolved in an era where giant regional processing labs were the norm. I was technical manager for 7 such labs in the Southeast United States. Each was sized to handle 20,000 rolls of color film a day. Such labs as these were duplicated in countless locals worldwide. Regardless of what you think, the vast majority outputted a top quality product, The standards were plus/minus 1/6 of an f-stop. Additionally, the color balance of outputted prints was topnotch.
That being said, when you process at this volume, the chemistry must have an indefinite life. Now we are talking, automatic temperature control, both heating and refrigeration. Test films are run interlaced with customer film. Test strips are measured and graphed with high precision.
Chemical tanks are filled with a tank formula and replenished, based on the graphs with a specialized replenished formula. The bleach must not only be replenished, it must be aeriated. The EDTA (red) bleach is iron based and its operation depends on the level of iron oxidation. The fixer accumulates silver complexes. As this fluid works to remove silver salts and metallic silver, it’s silver level must be controlled. This is accomplished by on-line electrolytic devices.
Besides all the problems of keeping the solutions at specification, the lab must sewer or haul-away to an licensed waste facility. In other words, fluids are treated, re-used and then finally discarded safely.
It is not economically feasible to mass process without keeping the bleach and fix as separate chemical baths. The color paper developing process did combine the bleach and the fix. This works out OK but separate would be better. This is true because paper prints can be reprinted if something goes wrong, film if ruined is usually not salvageable.
Separating bleach and fix is not a requirement is a home darkroom setting.
Modern color films contain miniature light-sensitive crystals. These are compounds of silver combined with a halogen (Swedish for salt maker). These halogens are iodine, chlorine, and bromine. They are imbedded in gelatin to form an emulsion. Color films consist of multiple emulsion coats, each doctored so they become light-sensitive to one of the three light primary colors, which are red, green, and blue.
The C-41 film, when exposed in the camera, receives a latent (Latin for hidden) image. This latent image is proportional to scene brightness and coloration.
As the film develops, developing agents seek out exposed crystals and reduce them to metallic silver and a halogen. The halogen is dissolved away in the waters of the developer. Remaining is a tuft of opaque metallic silver. This silver creates the black and white image. As the tufts of silver materialize, they will be acted upon by oxygen dissolved in the waters of the developer. The tufts of silver are caused to tarnish.
Dispersed in each emulsion are incomplete oily globules of dye -- cyan dye in the red sensitive emulsion, magenta in the green emulsion, and yellow in the blue emulsion. Being incomplete, they are said to be in a leuco state, (Greek for white). All three are missing the same ingredient which is present in the color developer. Those dye globules adjacent to tarnished tuffs of metallic silver are caused to unite with the missing dye ingredient. They now blossom into cyan, magenta and yellow dyes based upon their emulsion layer.
At this stage the film contains unexposed and thus undeveloped silver salts. The film also contains tufts of metallic silver forming a black & white image in each emulsion. The film also contains a cyan image, a magenta image and a yellow image.
The yellow image is fine-looking, the magenta image is fair, and the cyan image is actually substandard. To correct these deficiencies, the leuco magenta and the leuco cyan are tinted. This forms the orange mask of the C-41 film. Its purpose is to bolster the magenta and yellow dye image. The mask is not uniform as to its density. The mask forms two positive colored images superimposed on the three negative colored images. This makes of total of 5 colored images.
As the C-41 film emerges from the color developer, the colors are veiled by the metallic silver images, and the film has residual unexposed and thus undeveloped silver crystals.
A bleach to the rescue! The word bleach is deceiving. This solution seeks metallic silver and changes it back to a silver halide. This act sets up the film for fixing (to render permanent). The fixer is a solvent for silver halogens. The fixer removes most all traces of silver from the film.
Now the dyes have blossomed and the film is long-lasting. The dyes used are organic. Organic means they are made from the chemicals of life. Such things exist in a narrow environment. We are talking temperature, humidity, contamination and pH and the like. If these parameters are exceeded, the dye modifies. That is the reason that unpredictable results occur when something goes wrong either in the processing steps or in storage.
Originally by user44949. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user44949
5y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Separate bleach and fixer mainly offer two advantages over blix in C-41:
-
Better chemistry longevity in higher-volume use. Bleach and fixer have conflicting storage needs: bleach benefits from oxygen, while fixer (thiosulfate-based) does not. Combining them into blix is a convenience tradeoff, but it generally won’t keep as well as separate baths. For occasional home processing, this may not matter much because kit developer life is often the limiting factor anyway.
-
More process control. With separate bleach and fix, you can vary or skip bleaching for effects such as bleach bypass, rather than being locked into a combined step.
As for image quality, a properly run blix kit can still produce very good C-41 negatives, especially for home users. The main benefit of separate bleach and fix is not usually a dramatic visible improvement in everyday negatives, but better chemical management and more flexibility—particularly if you process enough film to care about replenishment, consistency, or creative control.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI5y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can Kodak commercial C-41 chemicals be used for home film developing?
What’s the difference between 2-bath, 3-bath, and multi-step C-41 processing kits?
Can ferricyanide bleach be used for C-41 and E-6 film without causing a magenta or purple cast?
Why do my home-developed C-41 negatives scan with low contrast and saturation?
Tetenal C-41 kit unavailable in the UK: are there alternatives?