Was orthochromatic black-and-white film still used after panchromatic film became common?
Asked 5/22/2020
4 views
2 answers
0
Films and TV often show black-and-white film being handled under a red safelight. Since panchromatic film cannot be used that way, is there a realistic late pre-digital scenario where someone such as a journalist or lab worker would still be using non-panchromatic (orthochromatic) film, or is this mostly cinematic shorthand? I'm specifically asking whether ortho film remained in real use long after panchromatic film existed, not whether movies exaggerate darkroom lighting for the camera.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
6y ago
2 Answers
3
Ortho films were common as late as 1950. Panchro types were available as early as 1895 (based on the invention of tricolor technique around that time).
The famous Verichrome Pan, the commonest black and white film for American family photos as late as the 1980s, was called that to distinguish from the earlier Verichrome, which was an ortho film that was made from the 1930s until the early 1950s. "Verichrome" refers to "true color" to distinguish the film from the still earlier blue-sensitive stocks that were still familiar to photographers of the time.
Additionally, most Hollywood films shot before 1940 used ortho film -- the color response of which is responsible for the green tinted makeup that appears in the 1960s TV series The Munsters -- green was substituted for red on ortho films, because red lips, cheek blush, etc. recorded as unnaturally dark. Panchromatic films were available, but like many other things, cost was a big factor in film production, and panchro films generally cost more, in part because they couldn't be packaged and produced under red safelight, but had to be produced and handled in total darkness.
Possibly related to the cited (TV series?) scene, many microfilms were orthochromatic right up until the end of the film document storage era, and as noted in a comment, scientific film stocks often had no need for red sensitivity -- and even today, it's simpler to produce an ortho emulsion than a panchro type, because a single sensitizing dye (pinacryptol yellow, found in food coloring) can add green sensitivity to a basic blue-sensitive emulsion, but red sensitivity requires more expensive and harder to obtain specialty dyes.
Originally by user89902. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user89902
6y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes—orthochromatic film remained in real use for quite a long time after panchromatic film was invented. Ortho films were still common into the mid-20th century, while panchromatic materials had existed since the 1890s. Older ortho black-and-white stocks were still being made into the 1950s, and ortho film also remained useful for some specialized purposes later on.
That said, the way movies show it is often not realistic. A true safelight is dim; the bright red “darkroom” lighting seen on screen is usually cinematic shorthand so the audience can see what’s happening. So a scene showing film handling under red light can be loosely plausible if ortho film is being used, but the brightness and overall look are usually artistic license.
For everyday journalistic work in the 1980s–1990s, panchromatic film would generally be the normal choice rather than ortho film.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI6y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can a filter on panchromatic B&W film mimic orthochromatic film tonality?
Can a cheap red night light be used as a darkroom safelight?
Can Agfa Scala film still be processed, and are old Scala mailers still valid?
Can you use color fixer for black-and-white film, or black-and-white fixer for color film?
How can I safely tell whether an old Kodak Plus-X roll has already been developed?