Underwater photography for scuba diving: GoPro or DSLR housing?

Asked 3/31/2014

3 views

2 answers

0

I already own a Canon 650D and am considering underwater photography for scuba dives to around 40m. My two main options are:

  1. Buy an underwater housing for the 650D
  2. Buy a GoPro instead

The housing is expensive, which makes the GoPro appealing because it is smaller, lighter, cheaper, and useful for other activities where I do not want to risk more fragile gear. On the other hand, I know the DSLR should give better image quality, especially in low light, and I am concerned about whether a GoPro’s image quality underwater is good enough to justify choosing it over a proper housing.

I am also thinking long term: a housing is camera-specific, but if I upgrade bodies later, the 650D could become my dedicated underwater camera.

For someone starting underwater photography, when does it make more sense to invest in a DSLR housing, and when is a GoPro the better choice?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

12y ago

2 Answers

5

Having been in your situation, I can safely say there are no perfect answers. I had an xTi (400D) and was looking to do underwater photography. I ended up deciding it was not worth it to get an underwater enclosure that cost more than the camera itself, so decided to wait until I could get a nicer camera to be worth it.

In the interim, I went looking for devices that would handle my needs and came down to going between the GoPro and the SeaLife DC1400. While the GoPro is very ruggedized and simple, it also lacks much in the way of controls, anything in the way of zoom and lacks the underwater specialization of the SeaLife cameras. It isn't a bad choice, but it lacks the support for underwater flashes which are absolutely critical to having clear color at depth. (Though you can use constant output lights for things up closer.)

The Sealife camera ended up being the winner for me because it has white balance modes specific to shooting underwater at various depths and includes a solidly built enclosure for a reasonable price. The quality is good enough and it makes a nice stop gap until I can get my underwater enclosure for my 5D Mark iii. It also supports use of flashes and is far easier to control and use underwater as it is designed for the purpose.

With a GoPro, you will basically clip it to your mask and record whatever it happens to get. With the SeaLife camera or something similar, you will actually be able to capture what you want in the way you want with far greater flexibility and control.

There isn't a right or wrong answer here, and certainly the underwater enclosure for your DSLR will get the best results by far, but it is a question of how much you want to spend and how much use you want outside of water. (The Sealife can be used outside it's enclosure, but it is then just an slightly basic P&S.)

Originally by user11392. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user11392

12y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

It mainly depends on whether the dive is photography-focused or diving-focused.

If your goal is serious underwater photography, a housed DSLR is the better path. It gives you more control, RAW capture, and better options for underwater lighting. External lighting is important underwater because color and contrast drop quickly with depth. The tradeoff is bulk, cost, and handling a much larger rig during the dive.

If your main goal is diving and you just want to capture the experience, a GoPro is often the better fit. It is compact, rugged, easy to carry, and simple to use. But it has important limits: less manual control, no zoom, and weaker support for the kind of lighting setup that helps produce high-quality underwater photos.

So: choose the DSLR housing if image quality and expandability matter most; choose the GoPro if convenience, size, and cost matter more than ultimate photo quality.

UniqueBot

AI

12y ago

Your Answer