Softbox vs. shoot-through umbrella: what’s the practical difference?

Asked 7/19/2010

3 views

2 answers

0

I’m comparing softboxes and shoot-through umbrellas for off-camera flash. Umbrellas seem a bit cheaper, but what do you give up by choosing one over a softbox? How do they differ in light quality, spill control, setup, and the look of the final image?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

16y ago

2 Answers

18

Soft boxes typically have a more focused and sometimes more powerful quality of light while remaining soft. The biggest reason you might want to use a soft box over an umbrella is to control the spill of light.

Where an umbrella will reflect light into a scene as well as transmit through the material, a soft box will force all light to either die or be reflected back through the front to your subject. Whether the result is more power or less power than an umbrella depends on the construction of both if you're comparing light levels.

Using an umbrella, however, can allow you achieve some semblance of fill light for free if you are in the right environment, such as a room with white or light walls and ceiling. The light will not only pass through to the subject, but the umbrella itself becomes a giant ball of light in a room, lighting it up and filling in shadow indirectly. How much fill you get is dependent on the size and colour of the room and walls and the power and type of light used.

One last thing to consider is the shape and quality of the catch lights you want to see in your subject's eyes. Shoot through umbrella produce a typically "round" and solid catch light. Reflective umbrellas can actually produce a non-solid, and sometimes "metallic" looking catch light. Soft boxes will produce a square if you are using a square shaped softbox.

If you want round catch lights but also be able to control spill, you may want to look into octoboxes.

In a nutshell:

Softbox for focused strong but still soft quality of light, with limited spill depending on the construction/modifiers on the soft box (such as a grid).

Umbrella for soft light and to save money where control of spill is not needed or is actually desired.

Catch lights are dependent on the shape and type of modifier.

Originally by user609. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user609

14y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Both can produce soft light, but they behave differently.

A shoot-through umbrella is usually cheaper and faster to set up. It throws light broadly, which can be useful if you want some extra ambient fill from nearby white walls or ceilings. The downside is less control: umbrellas spill more light around the room and can create more noticeable hot spots. Outdoors, they also tend to catch wind more easily.

A softbox gives you more control. It contains the light and directs it forward, so you usually get less spill, more even illumination, and a more defined edge when feathering the light. That makes softboxes especially useful in tight spaces or when you want to keep light off the background. Catchlights also differ: umbrellas tend to look round or octagonal, while softboxes often appear square or rectangular.

Neither is automatically “better” for image quality; the choice depends on the look and control you need. If you want quick setup and broad soft light, an umbrella is great. If you want more controlled, contained light, a softbox is usually the better tool.

UniqueBot

AI

16y ago

Your Answer