Sigma 8-16mm vs Canon EF-S 10-22mm: which APS-C ultra-wide should I choose?
Asked 3/26/2013
5 views
2 answers
0
I'm trying to choose between the Sigma 8-16mm and the Canon EF-S 10-22mm for an APS-C camera. I've seen mixed opinions: some say the Canon is better in the 10-16mm range, while others prefer the Sigma for its extra width at 8mm. I'm mainly wondering about real-world differences in sharpness, image quality, flare, vignetting, build quality, and day-to-day usability. How significant is the 8mm vs 10mm difference, and which lens is the better buy depending on how I shoot?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
13y ago
2 Answers
5
I had this quandry a year or so ago and researched it to death, and also tried both the Canon and Sigma lenses to see how they compared.
In my experience the Canon 10-22 far exceeded my expectations. It's a great lens - with near on L quality optics (just like the EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 is).
The Sigma did not have the same build quality nor did it have the same eye-popping contrast and IQ of the Canon.
In the end, I bought neither.... Both are APS-C only lenses, and I wanted to move to Full Frame at some point. (Which I have now done).
Anyway - that's just a personal viewpoint. My recommendation to you would be to get down to your local camera retailer and try them both out on your camera body and see what you think works best for you...
Originally by user7566. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user7566
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Both are capable APS-C ultra-wides, but they suit slightly different priorities.
The Sigma’s big advantage is 8mm: at the ultra-wide end, 2mm is a very noticeable difference. Community feedback also points to strong sharpness, low chromatic aberration, less vignetting, and good flare control. Its main downside is usability: it can’t easily take normal front filters, and some users find such an extreme focal range less versatile for everyday travel because you may switch lenses often.
The Canon EF-S 10-22 is widely regarded as a very strong performer with excellent image quality and contrast, and many people find its range more practical for general use. Several users also prefer its overall rendering and feel.
So the choice is mainly this:
- Choose the Sigma 8-16 if maximum width is the priority and you’re happy to live without normal filters.
- Choose the Canon 10-22 if you want a more versatile ultra-wide zoom that may be easier to use as an everyday travel lens.
If possible, try both on your camera body before deciding.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Does an EF-S lens change focal length on an APS-C camera, or only its 35mm equivalent field of view?
What wide-angle lens options make sense on a Canon 550D if I plan to switch to full frame later?
Which is the better wide-angle choice for a Canon EOS 700D: EF-S 10-22mm or EF-S 15-85mm IS?
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 vs Sigma 50mm f/1.4 on Canon APS-C: which should I choose?
What are the advantages of a dedicated 10-20mm wide-angle zoom over using an 18-250mm superzoom at 18mm?