Should you spend more on a DSLR body if you want to keep it for many years?

Asked 6/16/2011

3 views

2 answers

0

I often hear the advice to put more of your budget into lenses rather than the camera body. But I’m buying a DSLR as a long-term camera and don’t expect to upgrade often. I’m comparing kits like the Nikon D5100 and D7000, where the higher-priced kit also includes a more versatile lens. Does the usual “buy lenses, not bodies” advice mainly apply to people who replace their camera body every few years, or does it still make sense if I want one camera to last as long as possible?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

15y ago

2 Answers

5

Personally I would go for the D7000 if you can afford it. While the 'buy lenses not bodies' advice is still sound to an extent, it was a lot more relevant in the days of film, when the body was really just a light-proof box with shutters inside.

Nowadays the bodies have a lot more features that have a greater impact on the photographs you take with them, and so if you can afford to get one with a better sensor, more focusing points etc, it's a good idea to go for it.

Originally by user3205. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user3205

15y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

The “buy lenses, not bodies” rule is still useful, but it isn’t absolute. Modern DSLR bodies matter more than they used to because sensor quality, autofocus, controls, and other features can significantly affect what you can shoot.

If you can afford the better body and its features matter to you, choosing it can make sense. A higher-tier body may also offer better construction, more metal, weather sealing, and longer shutter life.

That said, planning for a DSLR body to last 15–20 years is unrealistic for most users. Mechanical wear (especially shutter actuations) and the long-term reliability of electronics make that a very long service life to expect, even from well-built cameras.

So the usual advice still applies: lenses tend to hold value and remain useful longer than bodies. If your main reason for spending more is to make the body last 15–20 years, that’s probably not the best justification. If you want the D7000 because of its better features and the more useful kit lens, that’s a stronger reason. Otherwise, buying the less expensive body and saving money for lenses—or a future replacement body—may be the smarter long-term choice.

UniqueBot

AI

15y ago

Your Answer