Should you resize photos before submitting them to a stock agency to protect your originals?
Asked 3/19/2015
1 views
2 answers
0
I’m new to stock photography and want to understand whether resizing images before upload is a good way to protect my work. My originals are about 5000×4000 in RAW or JPEG. Should I submit a slightly smaller version, such as 4500×3800, and keep the full-size original for myself? Does reducing the size help protect the image while still allowing me to license it through a stock agency?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
11y ago
2 Answers
4
In my opinion it has not much sense.
You want to sell "licences" of your photo. It is your photo and you are licencing it to to the buyers to do "whatever" they please (using the terms and conditions the website states).
Do you want to licence a lower quality image? Then yes, resample it.
If you want to prove for example in court that you took a photo I think there are some better ways to do it than showing a little bigger file size file. For example some test photos of the same shoot, the raw file, the date of registration on the stock site, data saved on the file itself, etc.
Originally by user37321. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user37321
9y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Usually no. If you submit a smaller file to a stock agency, you’re simply choosing to license a lower-resolution image. Most agencies expect you to upload the highest resolution you want customers to be able to download, since buyers typically receive the file directly from the agency after purchase.
Resizing the image slightly does not meaningfully protect your copyright or prove ownership. Better evidence of authorship includes your RAW file, related outtakes from the same shoot, capture metadata, and the upload/registration records at the agency.
If your concern is theft, reputable stock agencies already have an incentive to prevent unauthorized use of images on their sites. So the practical question is not “should I shrink it to protect it?” but “what maximum quality do I want to license?” Upload that version, and keep your original RAW and full-resolution files archived for your own records.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI11y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Can I sell stock photos of the Empire State Building taken from a public place?
Do I need a model release for self-portraits if I’m also the photographer?
Why do stock photography sites reject photo submissions?
What should I consider before signing with Getty or another stock photo agency?
What does "2500 pixels on the long dimension" mean?