Should I worry about lens mount compatibility when buying my first DSLR?
Asked 9/3/2011
3 views
2 answers
0
I’m choosing my first DSLR in the entry-level range, mainly between Canon EOS Rebel models and Nikon D3000/D3100/D5000/D5100. One concern is long-term system support: years ago my family’s 35mm SLR system became hard to support after the manufacturer moved on from that mount. If I buy into Canon or Nikon now, is there a real risk that lenses and accessories will become difficult to buy or incompatible in the near future? Should mount longevity affect which beginner DSLR system I choose?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
14y ago
2 Answers
9
You will probably replace the camera body you buy now long before any of the current camera manufacturers retire their systems (or go out of business or whatever). With the rate of improvement and innovation in camera electronics right now, one generally doesn't consider a camera body to be a long-term purchase. A bigger concern would be the accessories you buy within that system. Lenses (and to some extent, system-specific flashes) can easily be the bulk of your investment. In fact, "can" is too weak — if you're serious about photography at all, they will be and should be. And lenses should last through many generations of camera bodies. So, if your ability to use them with a new camera were to be limited, that'd be unfortunate.
However, I wouldn't worry too much. In the event that something changes, a) you will likely be able to get adapters, which is rarely ideal but should still let your equipment work, and b) there will be enough people interested in keeping going with the system they have that your gear should keep a decent resale value for a little while, which would either let you switch to something else — or you could be on the other side, buying up people's stuff as they bail out. In other words, a system won't vanish in a day.
Originally by user1943. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1943
14y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
It’s reasonable to think about, but for current Canon and Nikon DSLRs it’s usually not the main thing to worry about.
Camera bodies tend to be replaced much sooner than lens mounts disappear. Your bigger long-term investment is the system: lenses, and to a lesser extent flashes. Manufacturers generally avoid abandoning a mount casually because they want to keep existing users and lens compatibility.
Mounts do change sometimes when new technology demands it, but often with some backward compatibility, and older lenses can sometimes still be used via adapters or with limited automation. Good lenses often outlast many camera bodies and can retain usefulness for decades.
So for mainstream systems like Canon and Nikon, the risk of near-term obsolescence is low enough that it shouldn’t stop you from buying. Choose based on the lenses and accessories you expect to want, not just the current body. If long-term flexibility matters, investing in quality lenses is more important than stretching for a more expensive entry-level body.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI14y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Canon 600D (Rebel T3i) vs Nikon D5100 for a first DSLR
Will an older Nikon film SLR lens work on a newer Nikon DSLR body?
Can a pre-AI Nikkor-P lens damage a Nikon D3000?
How can I use an SB-600 off-camera with a Nikon D3000, and will it still work after upgrading bodies?
Are camera serial numbers unique across a manufacturer or only within each model?