Should I switch from an entry-level Canon DSLR to mirrorless for baby and kids photos?
Asked 10/16/2012
2 views
2 answers
0
I have an entry-level Canon DSLR with the 18-55mm kit lens, a 50mm f/1.8, and a 70-300mm. With a baby on the way, I expect to take lots of photos and am wondering whether I should switch to a micro four thirds or other mirrorless camera because it would be lighter and easier to carry.
My concern is that while mirrorless bodies are smaller, they may be slower to handle and autofocus may not be as fast, especially once a child starts moving quickly. For photographing babies and young kids, is it better to keep my current DSLR system, perhaps with a smaller lens, or move to mirrorless for portability?
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
13y ago
2 Answers
9
My advice goes for no, don't switch.
You always have the backup camera in your phone; do you currently even try capturing pictures with that when your big DSLR is away? If not, I suspect the real reason why you're not taking pictures now is not the size of your camera. It's probably either lacking time or dismissing opportunities to actually take some photos. For keeping memories, phone pictures will often be good enough; they sure beat having no picture at all. If you have plenty of failed phone pictures to show, then yeah, you might need something in between.
Try carrying the DSLR with only one lens, say the nifty fifty. This is much smaller than lugging the whole kit around, and not really that much bigger than a mirrorless would be, and solves quality issues in genres where a camera phone comes weakest (low light, action). If needed, a 40mm pancake lens would even give you a more compact system.
Changing camera systems is a pretty major investment compared to starting using what you already have. With a baby coming, there are already many expenses and reduction in income per capita to worry about.
Originally by user4390. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user4390
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Based on the answers, the safer advice is to keep your DSLR for now.
Your current setup already includes a very useful lens for baby photos: the 50mm f/1.8. It’s small, light, and well suited to indoor portraits where light is limited. That matters because babies are often photographed at home, and low-light performance plus fast autofocus are real advantages for a DSLR.
Mirrorless cameras are smaller and more convenient to carry, and that can help if a larger camera tends to stay at home. Modern mirrorless bodies can be quite good, but autofocus and responsiveness may still fall behind a DSLR in dim light or with fast-moving kids.
A good compromise is to simplify what you carry before changing systems: take the DSLR with just the 50mm lens instead of the whole kit. If you still find you’re leaving it behind and missing pictures, then a mirrorless body may be worth considering.
In short: don’t switch yet. Use the DSLR you already own, especially with the 50mm f/1.8, and reassess after the baby arrives if size really proves to be the limiting factor.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Best studio backdrops for baby and child portraits
Should I choose an entry-level APS-C DSLR or a mirrorless/compact camera?
How should I choose between a DSLR, mirrorless camera, or compact as my first serious camera?
Entry-level DSLR vs Canon PowerShot: what are the practical differences?
What camera settings or gear help freeze a fast-moving child indoors?