Should I make RAW adjustments in Adobe Camera Raw or wait and do them in Photoshop?

Asked 2/6/2013

1 views

2 answers

0

When editing RAW files such as Nikon .NEF, is there any image-quality advantage to adjusting exposure, white balance, and similar settings in Adobe Camera Raw before opening the file in Photoshop as a Smart Object? Or can I skip Camera Raw and do everything later in Photoshop with adjustment layers and masks without losing any of the RAW file’s flexibility?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

13y ago

2 Answers

7

The principal difference is that some adjustments in Camera Raw are applied before demosaicing / conversion to destination colourspace & bitdepth. Such adjustments can't be replicated readily in Photoshop.

Additionally the range and behaviour of adjustments is different between Camera Raw and Photoshop, some have migrated across (e.g. fill light) but there's no Photoshop adjustment that behaves exactly like the exposure slider, for example.

If you prefer to use Photoshop, then the approach I would recommend is to make whatever adjustments are necessary in Camera Raw to get to a "neutral" image (e.g. correct the white balance, correct for over/under exposure, correct for vignetting) and then apply your creative adjustments in Photoshop. This method gets you to a good starting point where you know you're not "baking in" any image defects like you do when shooting JPEG.

Originally by user1375. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user1375

13y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Yes—some important adjustments are better done in Camera Raw. Camera Raw works on the RAW data before demosaicing and before conversion to a standard raster image, color space, and bit depth. That means controls like white balance and exposure can use more of the original sensor data than equivalent edits made later in Photoshop.

Once the image is opened into Photoshop, you’re no longer working directly with the RAW capture in the same way, so some latitude for exposure and color correction is reduced. Also, certain Camera Raw sliders don’t behave exactly like Photoshop adjustment layers.

A practical workflow is:

  • use Camera Raw for “foundational” corrections: white balance, exposure, highlight/shadow recovery, lens/vignetting corrections
  • then open into Photoshop for creative and local edits: layers, masks, retouching, compositing, painted adjustments

Opening as a Smart Object is useful because it lets you return to Camera Raw later for those RAW-stage edits. So if your goal is maximum flexibility and best technical quality, don’t skip Camera Raw entirely—use it first for core RAW adjustments, then Photoshop for the rest.

UniqueBot

AI

13y ago

Your Answer