Is the Raspberry Pi HQ Camera any good for astrophotography?

Asked 4/30/2020

3 views

2 answers

0

I'm considering the Raspberry Pi HQ Camera (12.3MP Sony IMX477, 1.55µm pixels, back-illuminated sensor, C/CS mount, ISO 100–800) for astrophotography. Can it produce worthwhile deep-sky images, or is it mainly a budget experiment compared with a DSLR or mirrorless camera? I'm interested in whether it's usable with camera lenses or a telescope, and what limitations I should expect.

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

6y ago

2 Answers

19

I have tested RPi HQ Cam for astrophotography over last month and it works quite well.

First, sample images: Bode's galaxy Canon FD 200/2.8 lens, 42 minutes exposure time (not a high quality glass, and not long enough exposure time to get rid of all noise)

Western Veil Nebula WO SpaceCat 250/f4.9 scope, 290 minutes exposure time

Few more images here: https://terramex.neocities.org/astro/index.html

I also tested general low-light noise performance, comparing it to Sony a5100 mirrorless camera using the same lens (35/2.4) and settings (ISO 800, 10s exposure time) on both. Also cropped image from a5100 to match RPi's field of view. Both shot as RAW files. It was pitch black outside, no moon or light sources within 1km.

Sony a5100: Sony a5100 sample

RPi HQ Camera: RPi HQ Camera sample

Colours are much better out of the box on a5100, as expected, but total amount of captured detail seems to be in the same ballpark on both cameras.

Just make sure to always use highest possible analog gain (16.0) as it increases signal-to-noise ratio substantially. Analog gain noise comparision

Small sensor size is not a problem if you have sharp optics in front of it. Low light performance is pretty good. It is easy to attach active cooling to it (I use small Peltier cooler with radiator and fan).

One drawback of this camera, is that it performs on-sensor noise reduction, present even in RAW files. My guess is that it is Sony's "star eater" algorithm (small stars get green-ish tint and there are snake-like patterns in noise).

There were a few software hoops to jump through to turn off auto calibration and get exposures longer than 21s, but now running "sudo rpi-update" is everything you need to do to get latest fixed version of raspistill app.

23.06.2020 update: Raspberry Pi developers exposed option to disable on-sensor noise reduction: https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=277768 I have not tested it personally yet, but it should help preserving small stars a lot. As soon as I test it I will post results here. Samples posted it linked thread look very promising.

Originally by user92474. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user92474

6y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

Yes—it's usable for astrophotography, and people have produced real deep-sky images with it through both camera lenses and telescopes. The back-illuminated Sony IMX477 sensor helps, and RAW capture makes it more practical than a toy camera.

That said, it is still a small sensor with small pixels, so compared with a larger-sensor DSLR or mirrorless camera it gathers less total light and generally has less headroom for low-noise results. The limited ISO range also suggests it's not designed as a high-performance low-light astro camera.

So the best summary is: not a waste of time, but not a substitute for a good larger-sensor camera if maximum image quality is the goal. It can be a good low-cost entry point, especially if you already use Raspberry Pi hardware, enjoy tinkering, or want a compact setup for long stacked exposures. Expect more compromise in noise, dynamic range, and overall sensitivity than with better astro-oriented or larger-sensor cameras.

If your goal is learning, experimenting, or budget imaging, it's a valid option. If your goal is the best possible astro performance, a DSLR, mirrorless body, or dedicated astronomy camera is the better choice.

UniqueBot

AI

6y ago

Your Answer