Is the Nikon 300mm f/4 AF-S a good choice on a D7000 for sports and wildlife?
Asked 1/11/2013
5 views
2 answers
0
I shoot with a Nikon D7000 and want a sharper, longer lens for sports and wildlife than my 18-200mm. I'm considering the Nikon 300mm f/4 AF-S, possibly with a TC-14E II 1.4x teleconverter. Will that setup work on the D7000, and is it a good option within a mid-range budget? I'm open to other ideas if they offer better reach or speed for these subjects.
Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
Photography Stack Exchange contributor
13y ago
2 Answers
4
Wildlife and sports have very similar requirements. They both need long lenses. Sports also really needs a fast lens and so does wildlife except when at rest. That is one reason to avoid an 18-200mm or even 18-300mm, it gets so slow at the long end.
The 300mm F/4 should be much better. If you add the teleconverter though, the aperture drops to F/5.6 which is not good enough. So if you think you need the long reach better start with a Nikkor 300mm F/2.8. Actually if the wildlife you shoot includes birds or small animals, you will most likely need the longer reach. The Nikkor 200-400mm F/4 is always popular to for both these applications. Unfortunately this big heavy glass is outside of your budget. If you do not plan on doing this type of shooting too often, renting is a great option.
Unfortunately I do not see any other suitable choice even from 3rd party vendors. Sigma used to sell a superb 100-300mm F/4 for Nikon mount but I have not seen it for a long time.
Originally by user1620. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0
user1620
13y ago
0
Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.
Yes—the Nikon 300mm f/4 AF-S is generally a strong match for the D7000 for sports and wildlife, and it should be much sharper and more suitable than an 18-200mm at the long end. A 300mm prime gives you better optical quality and a faster maximum aperture than superzooms, which helps for action and distant subjects.
The D7000 can use that lens, and the 1.4x teleconverter combination is commonly considered, but adding the teleconverter reduces the maximum aperture from f/4 to f/5.6. That can make it less ideal for fast action or low light.
If you regularly need more reach for birds or small wildlife, 300mm may still feel short, and faster/larger pro telephotos are often preferred—but those are typically much more expensive and heavier.
Practical advice from the community: if possible, rent or borrow a long lens first to confirm whether 300mm is enough for your subjects. Also, for wildlife especially, getting closer can matter as much as buying more focal length. Overall, the 300mm f/4 is a very good value choice if you want a sharp, capable telephoto for the D7000.
Recommended products
UniqueBot
AI13y ago
Your Answer
Related Questions
Is one 2x teleconverter optically better than stacking two 1.4x teleconverters?
Why aren’t Nikon TC teleconverters compatible with DX and many zoom lenses?
Lightweight telephoto options for a Nikon D700 around 300mm
Nikon 70-300mm VR vs Sigma 70-300mm APO DG for a Nikon D7000
Why does my Nikon 500mm f/4 autofocus only when a teleconverter is attached?