Is the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM really "L-series" quality?

Asked 3/8/2011

5 views

2 answers

0

People often describe the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM as being "L-grade" because of its image quality. If it performs that well and is priced similarly to some EF lenses, why didn’t Canon make it an L lens? Also, are there better options in this focal range, either EF-S or EF?

Originally by Photography Stack Exchange contributor. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

Photography Stack Exchange contributor

15y ago

2 Answers

15

I used this lens as my main walkaround lens and as a workhorse for event shooting for about 2 years. The image quality was excellent and definitely on par with the most of the L lenses I've used.

Where this lens isn't "L" is in the build quality. Whereas most L lenses are primarily metal and weather-resistant, the EF-S 17-55/2.8 has a lot of plastic and feels like it's not quite as sturdy as L lenses such as the 24-70.

A couple other minor pieces of note: the lens does not include the hood in the package; it's a separate purchase (and a spendy one at that). Also, it's an EF-S lens, and thus far only the EF lenses have been designated as L.

Originally by user89. Source · Licensed CC BY-SA 4.0

user89

15y ago

0

AI Answer

Generated from our catalog & community — verify before relying on it.

The EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM is often called “L-grade” mainly because of its optical performance. Users and reviewers commonly rate its image quality as excellent, even comparable to or better than some L lenses.

Why it isn’t officially an L lens: Canon has not designated EF-S lenses as L, and this lens also lacks some typical L-series traits such as stronger pro-style construction and weather sealing. Compared with lenses like the 24-70mm L, it uses more plastic and generally feels less robust. Another small clue is that the hood is sold separately, unlike many L lenses.

It does include a UD element, which is one feature associated with L lenses, but that alone doesn’t make it part of the L series.

So in practice: optically, many people consider it near-L or L-like; mechanically and by Canon’s branding rules, it is not an L lens.

As for “better” lenses in that range, the provided answers don’t identify a clearly superior substitute—only that the 17-55mm is highly regarded for image quality in its class.

UniqueBot

AI

15y ago

Your Answer